|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2008, 04:04 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
afaik fortune tellers don't exactly stack, but bad event makes a roll against every one of them.
|
September 2nd, 2008, 08:36 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
Tho I highly doubt this will ever get implemented, the way to make Luck/Misf scales really work is this:
Include the turn number as a variable to the severity of the events.
So you take every positive or negative effect that an event has and multiply it by some amount of the turn. This would prevent Misfortune from being such a point-mine as bad events in the late game would be REALLY BAD. Imagine a gold loss event of 500gp or so! On the other side of the coin it would also provide a boost to Luck in that it would provide more benefit to a large nation once the events-per-turn limit was reached.
|
September 2nd, 2008, 09:16 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 724
Thanks: 93
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
Good idea Ironhawk. A minor permutation would be to step the events based on turns, such as level 1 for turns 1 to 5, level 2 for 6 to 15, etc.
|
September 3rd, 2008, 06:06 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
The problem is not the number of turns, but the fixed (max) number of events: If you have 40 provinces in the late game, you still get only .. what was it? 4? .. events ..
If max number of events would be dependant on the number of provinces owned (e.g. max 1 event per every full 5 provinces) you would be a bit safer in the first turns, but into much more hurt in the late game .. .
And, o.c., there should not be any random events and mercs during the first 6 turns (5? 10?) of the game .. they can only be unbalancing, therefore ...
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|
September 3rd, 2008, 06:39 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 724
Thanks: 93
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
I suspect the limit on the number of events is a spacing issue, ie, there are only 4 slots allocated for events. Maybe it can be changed, maybe not.
This is based on the fact that I've discovered other limits in the course of modding. One example is that there are 5 lines available for modded sites. The game just ignores any commands beyond 5 lines.
|
September 4th, 2008, 05:54 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
Disabling game ending misfotrune in the first few turns was also what I was suggesting.
I also agree that the limit of 4 bad (or good) events really is necessary for misfortune to scale.
However, if the coding really is stuck on 4 events, Then I would suggest a slightly easier modification.
Generate random events based on the true incidence. Aka an empire of 30 territories might generate 5 bad events and 2 good ones.
Misfortune 3 would ensure that the 3 Worst events and 1 random event of the remaing 5 gets through. With 2 bad events and 2 good events remaing.. it would be 50/50 what kind of event you got.
Misfortune 2 .. would ensure that 2 worst events and 2 random events of the remaining 5 would get through.
How is this an improvement? rather than the first 4 chronolgoical events occur, it means that the the worst (best) events occur, according to your luck scale.
|
September 4th, 2008, 06:04 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
Yeah, right. Where do you live? Expect what can be done. Increasing event limit is the easiest thing to do and if it can't be done in dom3 then surely some more complicated ideas like your are even less possible. I at least hope that they will tell us when they start making dom4, so we can make a nice wishlist.
|
September 4th, 2008, 06:29 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
Increasing event limit is the easiest thing to do and if it can't be done in dom3 then surely some more complicated ideas like yours are even less possible.
|
You might be right with this one ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
I at least hope that they will tell us when they start making dom4, so we can make a nice wishlist.
|
.. and there is/was a wishlist somewhere.
ALAS, there will be no DOM4 .. they told us already, several times !!
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|
September 4th, 2008, 09:14 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
[quote=Arralen;636402]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
ALAS, there will be no DOM4 .. they told us already, several times !!
|
Not so at all. They just said that it's not the project that they are currently working on. They wanted something new and different, can hardly blame them. I think Dom4 will be better if they focus on something else for awhile, learn even more, see even more, become slightly more godlike.
|
September 5th, 2008, 02:10 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: The most dreadful (random) event?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
Yeah, right. Where do you live? Expect what can be done. Increasing event limit is the easiest thing to do and if it can't be done in dom3 then surely some more complicated ideas like your are even less possible.
|
You are right in that it probably isn't easier to create, but it seems like it might be easier to incorporate into the existing codebase. As such, it'd be a good suggestion if it's difficult to just increase the amount of events - as Chrispedersen said.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|