|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
August 2nd, 2012, 06:51 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 26
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
"Gold Dawn" small scenario; looking to be tested
So, I'll be setting out on making a series of at least a dozen scenarios under the moniker "Gold Dawn," which parallel "Red Dawn" but set in California (and in '85, not '84, for my own reasons).
They'll follow one another in storyline, being in the same geographical area (Northeastern California), but won't be a campaign, as I desire to provide the player with a wider variety of units than a campaign would make possible.
In any case, here's the first, and I'm looking for judgement as to whether it's too hard or too easy for the human player. I'm leaning towards "too easy."
There's no text file - I'll write that up later - you're a NG mech. company commander defending a rural airfield from a mixed-bag of Soviet light armor and mechanized infantry in a hasty attack. They're trying to take the airfield with advance forces before it can be heavily reinforced.
Not all of your troops have a full ammo load, and a couple of M113s are replaced by trucks due to the strategic situation. Expect a single M60A3TTS sent in a hurry from the 221st Armor Battalion in Nevada on a tank transporter as a reinforcement, as well as a pair of F-4Cs (the name's modified, as there aren't F-4Cs in the SPMBT OOB, but that's what were flown by the 163d Tactical Fighter Group out of Reno in '85).
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kurt Montandon For This Useful Post:
|
|
August 3rd, 2012, 03:28 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 20
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: "Gold Dawn" small scenario; looking to be tested
Sounds interesting, I just downloaded it and will give it a try today.
__________________
We can't have full knowledge all at once. We must start by believing; then afterwards we may be led on to master the evidence for ourselves.
--------St. Thomas Aquinas
|
August 3rd, 2012, 09:56 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Posts: 127
Thanks: 20
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: "Gold Dawn" small scenario; looking to be tested
Update:
I got a decisive victory using a medium risk strategy of deploying some of my M113s as 50 cal anti-tank units (I managed to kill 2x BTR and damage one BMP with a lucky 2 pen shot to the rear door). While this did not end well for my m113s I was still was able to stave off the soviet advance long enough for arrival and participation of my patton which saved my bacon. I only ended using about half the allotted time. I would have to say as far as difficulty goes your scenario provides a good medium-easy level of enjoyment. Its not frustratingly difficult while at the same time not so easy as to be a boring cakewalk.
I particularly liked the placement of the US scouts as I was able to use them to both carefully pick off routed units and recon from their tactically sound vantage points, only losing one to a sneaky Russian sniper.
As far as suggestions go: rather than scrapping the entire scenario you might want to consider making a harder version of the same thing and have Don or Andy include both with the next patch.
Anyways, thanks for the great scenario!
__________________
We can't have full knowledge all at once. We must start by believing; then afterwards we may be led on to master the evidence for ourselves.
--------St. Thomas Aquinas
|
August 4th, 2012, 04:06 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Crossville, TN
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 21
Thanked 39 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Re: "Gold Dawn" small scenario; looking to be tested
Only about 1/2 way through so far but the Dragon Teams have pretty much handled all the enemy vehicles. The M60 has been icing on the cake so far, picking off stragglers. Don't it expect the enemy to last much longer.
|
August 5th, 2012, 04:04 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cracow, Poland
Posts: 415
Thanks: 24
Thanked 293 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: "Gold Dawn" small scenario; looking to be tested
Have lost 53 men and 2 APCs, while Soviets 145 men, 17 APCs and 10 tanks. Had 4087:413 score what gave me decisive.
Pretty good scenario, I wouldn't actually harden it but instead bring the soldiers' values back to original SPMBT ones, so NG at base EXP 65 and Morale 70 (if I recall correctly) and Soviet Naval Infantry on EXP 75 Morale 80. This should already make it harder as Soviet training may prevail.
|
August 7th, 2012, 03:51 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 247
Thanks: 435
Thanked 275 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
Re: "Gold Dawn" small scenario; looking to be tested
very good scenario, small & fast, got a decisive victory on turn 11. Keep 'em coming
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|