|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
November 3rd, 2011, 01:41 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Hi,
Comment 1:
I begin by saying that this game is exceptional.
However, some things could be improved or changed to make it even better.
Suggestion 1: Crews
- Tank crews should have one SMG for self defense.
- Others should keep their initial close defense weapons when they leave their weapon system; now, they only have small guns.
Example:
A field gun crew have rifles or SMG for CD.
During a counter battery fire, they leave the FG.
After they left the FG, they are equipped only with pistols.
Where are riffles or SMG? They have lost!?
According me, we should have 2 kind of crew: 1 for tanks, and 1 for other weapon systems.
What do you think about that?
Thank you,
-Luc-
Last edited by -Luc-; November 3rd, 2011 at 02:04 PM..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to -Luc- For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 3rd, 2011, 02:46 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 919
Thanks: 26
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
I think the idea is that "crews" are not a fighting force.
A tank crew doesn't really want to leave the tank.
I'm not against them having maybe one smg though
|
November 3rd, 2011, 02:50 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yogyakarta, Nusantara
Posts: 468
Thanks: 99
Thanked 104 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Hi there!
Crews are not meant to be a fighting entity. Those rifles & SMGs they have if inside their weapon systems are meant to defend their mount (mortar, FG, etc). In it, they're still a fighting force. But once out of it, they're no longer classified as such. You can think of crews as those people fleeing the battlefield (and also their mount).
Maybe it's not realistic, but it's the way to keep the game balanced, because of the extreme freedom one can have on a game, compared to that of the real life.
|
November 3rd, 2011, 03:18 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Hi,
I agree, the crews are not combat troops.
But, if you have rifles or SMGs with 90 shots or more for your SD, you dont change for a pistol with 5. It make no sense...
I know it's just a detail, that's why it's a suggestion...
Thank you,
-Luc-
|
November 3rd, 2011, 03:20 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 898
Thanks: 45
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
I like the way it is
I think one reason it's the way it is, exp. with large Atry crews,
Is that some gamey guys would exploit the game after all rounds have been fired off,they would use them as a fighting force,which is not at all right,
they should stay with thier guns not abandon them or let them fall into enemy hands.
As for armour crews,,,if they survive thier mount blown up or have abandon they would certainly not be wanting a fight, more like wanting a medic.
Last edited by gila; November 3rd, 2011 at 03:31 PM..
|
November 3rd, 2011, 03:23 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 919
Thanks: 26
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Luc-
Hi,
But, if you have rifles or SMGs with 90 shots or more for your SD, you dont change for a pistol with 5. It make no sense...
-Luc-
|
Just look at it like they don't have those things.
I was thinking maybe one guy in the crew has an SMG with one clip (30 rounds) ,not 90.
|
November 3rd, 2011, 03:26 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by gila
I like the way it is
I think one reason it's the way it is, exp. with large Atry crews,
Is that some gamey guys would exploit the game after all rounds have been fired off,they would use them as a fighting force,which is not at all right.
As they should stay with thier guns not abandon them at let them fall into enemy hands.
|
Ok...
Maybe they can have rifles or SMGs with less shots...
Thank,
-Luc-
|
November 3rd, 2011, 05:28 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 898
Thanks: 45
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Luc-
Ok...
Maybe they can have rifles or SMGs with less shots...
|
Doubt it.
This has been discussed many times before and rejected,so don't hold your breath
|
November 3rd, 2011, 06:52 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Quote:
Originally Posted by gila
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Luc-
Ok...
Maybe they can have rifles or SMGs with less shots...
|
Doubt it.
This has been discussed many times before and rejected,so don't hold your breath
|
Yes - every now and then and then again and yet again, somebody wants "Rambo-ised crews"...
Crews will remain as-is for the reasons given by others above.
Andy
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 4th, 2011, 10:34 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Comments, suggestions and problem reports
Hi,
Suggestion 2: Ammo trucks
Should they not be similar to other heavy trucks?
Currently, they are easily identifiable and become easy targets.
I do not think it is so easy to identify these vehicles on the battlefield.
Suggestion 3: Trucks
Should they not have a single crew member (driver)?
Why 2, what the fonction of the second crew member (mechanic, helper)?
Thank you,
-Luc-
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|