I've just looked up the weapon for the RPG-30. According to ARMS-TASS it is designated the PG-30. Is it the same as the RPG-27 or is it somehow different? The PG-30 and RPG-27 are both 105mm with a tandem warhead.
P.S. When I wrote 'warhead' in my earlier posts I sometimes meant 'weapon.' Sloppy English on my part. I would go back and edit my mistakes - but I'm too late now.
I believe I saw it in one article that was posted on the topic on Tank-Net - generally RPG-27, plus that little rocket.
RUMINT has it that it was designed for a Mid-Eastern customer, that would give most likely Syria or Iran.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
I vaguely remember reading somewhere that Venezuela has also shown an interest in the RPG-30.
The game manual says that ‘Multi charge ATGM’ have a higher chance of defeating ERA than plain vanilla HEAT. I’ve assumed that ‘Multi-charge HEAT’ weapons – such as the newer RPGs – also have a higher chance of defeating ERA. Have I assumed too much? In any case, perhaps I should have used a multi charge ATGM as my example.
The game manual says that ‘Multi charge ATGM’ have a higher chance of defeating ERA than plain vanilla HEAT. I’ve assumed that ‘Multi-charge HEAT’ weapons – such as the newer RPGs – also have a higher chance of defeating ERA. Have I assumed too much? In any case, perhaps I should have used a multi charge ATGM as my example.
Yes, Multi-charge HEAT also has a higher chance of defeating ERA. That's what they are designed to defeat.