SETI@HOME Easter Egg! - Page 2

MikeRMcCartney · #11 December 13th, 2001, 05:08 AM

I think the whole idea is fantastic, and that people will show such a great interest is truly outstanding. I never thought about running more than 1 computer for the project, but now I may have to go to the scape pile to build a couple of machines just for SETI.

rdouglass · #12 December 13th, 2001, 07:10 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Baron Munchausen:

You've made a mistaken assumption. Did he say he was running just ONE computer? This 'public project' has inspired some serious hobbyists. There are people running SETI farms in their homes with dozens of computers. He might have a basement 'heating' network of Athlon's or something.

Not quite heating my office, but I have anywhere between 4 - 8 computers running @home overnite depending on various factors, day of the month, report workload, etc. At times I've had dual-processor servers running dedicated processes - it'll use all your horsepower if you let it. Its kinda' fun to participate in a project with unprecidented (spelling?) implications. Something like 3.5 million people donating CPU time for something that has an extremely slim chance of finding SETI. If you havent been there before (@home site), go there and check out their CPU stats and stuff - mind boggleing if you're into teraflops and terms like that....

Besides, those computers are on waiting for something to happen most of the time anyways...

Puke · #13 December 13th, 2001, 07:33 AM

i always liked the molecular analysis program that is akin to SETI@HOME. its sponsored by cisco and intel and friends and uses the same parallel processing technology to search for cures to cancer and other ailments by using peoples CPU cycles to look for matches between different molecules and.. well, whatever the hell they match up with. amino acids or something i would suppose.

the fineprint is that the sponsors rent out a few of the cpu cycles to crunch numbers for corporate financed private research projects, which is a pretty clever way of squeezing some profitibility out of bleeding-heart types. wish i thought of it myself. of course if you get down to the nitty gritty, most cancer research is done by profiteers anyhow, so i guess its hard to draw a line one way or the other.

there are also things like distributed.net and such that use your processor time to crack ungodly long encryption algorythms and to perform other such tasks. there enough projects out there to donate your CPU cycles to that you can pick and choose fairly freely. now if it was just tax deductable..

Baron Munchausen · #14 December 13th, 2001, 07:18 PM

quote:
Originally posted by MikeRMcCartney:
I think the whole idea is fantastic, and that people will show such a great interest is truly outstanding. I never thought about running more than 1 computer for the project, but now I may have to go to the scape pile to build a couple of machines just for SETI.

Yep, some people are putting 200 Mhz Pentiums to work on SETI@HOME. It takes several days for a 200Mhz Pentium to do a work unit, but what the hey. If you hook it to a network as a 'diskless workstation' and turn off the monitor it's like a large lightbulb. Just a little extra electricity on the bill.

Californians should probably not do this, though.

Baron Munchausen · #15 December 13th, 2001, 07:23 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Puke:
i always liked the molecular analysis program that is akin to SETI@HOME. its sponsored by cisco and intel and friends and uses the same parallel processing technology to search for cures to cancer and other ailments by using peoples CPU cycles to look for matches between different molecules and.. well, whatever the hell they match up with. amino acids or something i would suppose.

the fineprint is that the sponsors rent out a few of the cpu cycles to crunch numbers for corporate financed private research projects, which is a pretty clever way of squeezing some profitibility out of bleeding-heart types. wish i thought of it myself. of course if you get down to the nitty gritty, most cancer research is done by profiteers anyhow, so i guess its hard to draw a line one way or the other.

there are also things like distributed.net and such that use your processor time to crack ungodly long encryption algorythms and to perform other such tasks. there enough projects out there to donate your CPU cycles to that you can pick and choose fairly freely. now if it was just tax deductable..

It's mind-boggling to think of the computing power in the hands of the general public. Look at the numbers on the SETI site and then look at the Users. Only 3.5 million or so and only about 1/2 million really active. There are HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PCS OUT THERE... Even all of the known distributed computing projects combined have barely begun to tap this power.

Yes, private enterprise is trying desperately to find ways to exploit this. I think the govt. is too, but they have even more troubles than business. Tampering has been a problem for SETI@HOME all along, and National Security projects are not something you want to hand over to millions of potential hackers.

[ 13 December 2001: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]

zen. · #16 December 13th, 2001, 07:41 PM

I had no idea that the cure for cancer project did anything but. That is, if you're referring to the University of Oxford project (http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/curecancer.html).

But yah, getting paid for results would be kinda cool. Let the computer do some work for a change.