|
|
|
|
|
October 16th, 2006, 08:13 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: SE5 AI is pathetic
No AI treaty fixes in the first patch and it's on the to-do list with the Balance Mod. It's probably best done first though by Aaron since he has the best understanding of what needs to be changed. I recommended that a few functions should be thrown together to build relations in "steps". For example, the EEE might start with a non-agression and low trade treaty before maybe going for something like a trade and research deal etc. A particular AI's steps would be choosen differently depending on if they have a peaceful, neutral, or aggressive disposition.
For now I recommend counter-proposing "fair" deals to the AI when they request relations. It's a workaround, but in most cases it helps improve the current gameplay.
|
October 16th, 2006, 04:24 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 199
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE5 AI is pathetic
Wow thats uh horrid
|
October 16th, 2006, 04:26 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 155
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE5 AI is pathetic
Ironman rules are a must at this stage with the retard A.I.
|
October 16th, 2006, 04:43 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE5 AI is pathetic
Quote:
LordAxel said:
The worst thing is they should have NEVER EVER released this game with the state the multiplayer is in.
|
They could have pulled a Civ 3 and make you pay an extra $50 to get multiplayer play down the road.
|
October 16th, 2006, 04:52 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE5 AI is pathetic
i notice that most of the AIs in that screenshot are "neutrals". This means they dont expand, and generally dont put up much of a fight.
The stock AI isnt great, but it isnt awful either. in the real game, you can give the AI more of a bonus than in the demo. They will grow faster and expand quicker. Also, you can remove "neutrals"
Its still not going to be great, but whos AI is? and it will certainly be modded into better states. Even Oblivion (a huge game with many awards) is in dire need of "balance-modding"
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|
October 16th, 2006, 05:01 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: SE5 AI is pathetic
Ignoring the random treaty proposal and its effects, the overall AI tactics are decent and maybe improved from SE:IV. But like I said before the problem is moreso with the construction and resource management area. This is hurting expansion, which exacerbates the resource problem further meaning fewer ships and units.
-----
As usual, it's really only the TCP/IP that is really bugged as usual. You can have do the usual pbw-type thing with mostly good results.
|
October 17th, 2006, 11:02 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 202
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE5 AI is pathetic
Quote:
Puke said:
Even Oblivion (a huge game with many awards) is in dire need of "balance-modding"
|
I think they need to balance daggerfall before tackling oblivion.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|