Re: (OT) POWER of the Web (and apologies)
Thanks for the info, alarikf.
Things are getting a bit more tense now as I was called into the office to be warned of being "punished" for my website and warned about some language I used in an email. Apparently, referring to this guy as a "convicted" sexual harasser is considered to be possibly slanderous/libelous. Hey, if the shoe fits...why can't we say it fits? Also, referring to him as an [censored] was deemed "inappropriate". It was suggested that I might be labeled a "disgruntled" employee and that steps taken with a disgruntled employee might be loss of network access or "escorted to the building entrance". Not sure if "disgruntled" employee is some sort of legal federal term or not, but to me, it means someone who is upset. Didn't know one could be fired for being upset.
Well...I guess we'll see what happens.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|