|
|
|
|
|
March 4th, 2004, 10:10 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP poll : which map style you prefer
Karan size is my favorite size, 160-170 land and 20-25 water with some large inland bodies of water connected via rivers like targa did. I just feel that smaller maps have more character because they can require smaller tactics (ie.holding a pass btw you and your enemy), did that make any sense?
BB
|
March 4th, 2004, 10:20 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Urban Wilderness
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP poll : which map style you prefer
I rarely play maps with more than 110 provinces because I don't like the tedious micromanagement obligations of late game. I tend to use standard map settlings, but with very high magic (65%).
[ March 04, 2004, 20:24: Message edited by: Potatoman ]
|
March 4th, 2004, 11:08 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP poll : which map style you prefer
I'm a big fan of the World map. It's got a level of bottlenecking that just feels right: Not everything is split into bottlenecks, but the bottlenecking has that just-right feel to it.
This is entirely natural. After all, it's as natural a map as you're going to get, and nobody can rightly say they're not familiar to some extent with the map. Except a large number of Americans, apparently.
|
March 4th, 2004, 11:10 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP poll : which map style you prefer
Quote:
Originally posted by Buzzbomb:
I just feel that smaller maps have more character because they can require smaller tactics (ie.holding a pass btw you and your enemy), did that make any sense?
|
That's not a behavior of map size, that's a behavior of map topology. Both small and large maps can exhibit this behavior, depending on how the terrain is laid out.
[ March 04, 2004, 21:16: Message edited by: Norfleet ]
|
March 5th, 2004, 05:12 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP poll : which map style you prefer
I like just about every map size. Though for SP games I prefer large-huge maps. I haven't played a big map in MP yet, but considering that this game is made for PBEM I see no real problem with it.
For an afternoon hot seat game I like the "Aran" size maps. For a weekend game the "Orania" size.
For me, bottlenecks are as much a storytelling device as a strategic position. So I like'em a lot, but too many of them kind of defeat their purpose. Unlike others I do not like the "clear one valey at a time" expansion of HoMM. Holding a bottleneck should give you an advantage, but it has to be possible to circumvent them.
__________________
One rescue a day... that's my motto. - Deathstalker II
|
March 5th, 2004, 08:44 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: MP poll : which map style you prefer
Someone could make a large map... and then also several small maps which are sub-sections of it. Just an idea.
PvK
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|