.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT
Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 3rd, 2006, 10:51 PM

Siddhi Siddhi is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Siddhi is on a distinguished road
Default movement and fortifications

A couple of SPMBT (different) design issues that I recently grappled with in designing a scenario. I would be interested in comments.

i. vehicle movement in broken terrain
This has probably been addressed many times already, but I would like to know what the rational (gameplay?) was behind the current vehicle movement capability in broken or restricted terrain. Basically: why tanks (let alone wheeled APCs) can cross wooded terrain. They can't. Not even close, especially if it an old wood / heavily forested. Even a "young" wood with saplings can be dangerous, slipped tracks and lack of traction on broken wood will immobilise most tanks even under these circumstances pretty quickly. Designing a scenario (as I recently did in an upcoming scenario on Wargamer, SPANNOCHI'S DREAM II) with "impassable" terrain as a base for the wood only goes so far, the AI will still try it.

ii. Fortifications
Totally different database issue. For a scenario I felt I had to completely "redo" some of the bunker emplacements in the database; although the armament was mostly correct the hit ratios were much lower then they should have been. To accurately simulate a 1m reinforced conrete, I had to radically raise armour ratios - also, the "turret" rating had to be raised higher then it probably is as the "turrent" in an embunkered position is effectively just the firing slit, i.e. 25-30% of the size of a normal "turret". The size had to be decreased from 2 to 1 to give the bunkers a chance of survival, given that concealment is such a major issue for bunkers I thought it sensible.

iii. vehicle size
Something I have been unable to address but which detracts from gameplay is the none-modelling (as far as I can tell) of different tank sizes, leading to incorrect hit ratios. The T-55 e.g. is a full 40% smaller then a m60 front aspect, how can you have the same hit ratios for it? Many tanks were designed specifically to have a small front aspect, e.g. the Swedish assault-gun type construction of the 1970s with a fixed turrent.

I have a couple more but would be interested to hear if these issues
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.