Mathematically speaking (
)the concept of comparing WP/NATO inf maybe like adding up apples and oranges. Inf serves an army, the army functions within the framework of a doctrine, the doctrine is the way leadership thinks (or hopes) will achieve its strategic goals. The real question is which inf "serves" its side's doctrine better. How can you compare the "heavy" professional US cavalry with the "lighter" conscript USSR recce formations? In the opening phase of a WP/NATO conflict both units would be the forward element in an advance to contact situation but the USSR recce would mainly "access" what's in front of the main element, while the US cav would first "access" you and then kill you!
Plus it also depends on the specific WP/NATO country and, even more so, on the exact timeframe.
On the "infantry within doctrine" issue I'll leave the answer to the much more enlightened members of this forum!
Re: WP/Nato: Infantry discussion !
Threaded Mode