Loosing on purpose: morally justifiable? - .com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums

The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

		.com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Shrapnel General
Loosing on purpose: morally justifiable?

View Poll Results: Situation1: Would you still play to win with all force?
Y: The thrill is in the kill and there are always more opponents to be found on the internet anyway.		1	3.85%
Y: Stop bragging, keep playing and keep proving your capabilities!		1	3.85%
N: Playing the game is the fun! The short instant of winning is just a gas.		4	15.38%
Y: Playing the game is the fun! The short instant of winning is just a gas. So if they do not understand this, then there is no point in playing with them anyway.		4	15.38%
Y: Willingly loosing would be the same as betraying your friends. After all, they expect you to give your best!		3	11.54%
N: Allowing your friends to enjoy winning Dom2 is a noble cause.		1	3.85%
Y: Allowing your friends to enjoy winning Dom2 is a noble cause, but you are bad at keeping secrets. They will believe you that you could have won, so in the end they will feel betrayed by you, which is worse.		2	7.69%
Y: Allowing your friends to enjoy winning Dom2 is a noble cause, but you are bad at keeping secrets. They will not believe that you could have won, so in the end they will scorn you for being a boasting liar that cannot stand loosing.		0	0%
N: None of the above matters, but building up all those lovely toy armies took so much time that it would be shame not see them in action until all but the last tin soldier has fallen. So prolong the game as long as you can!		2	7.69%
?: I would discuss matters with them openly. They would have to agree to my superiority over them and we would negotiate some sacrifices of my forces and continue play on even terms.		5	19.23%
?: Like the one above, but I would still win in the end...		1	3.85%
?: Other. See my individual post.		2	7.69%
?: Who cares? I am here to discuss strategy games and not for answering your bloody questions of moral!		0	0%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

#11

Old

July 22nd, 2005, 10:01 AM

Xrati

Xrati is offline

First Lieutenant

Join Date: May 2005

Location: Outter Glazbox

Posts: 760

Thanks: 12

Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

Xrati is on a distinguished road

Default

Re: Loosing on purpose: morally justifiable?

"Special Olympics" do you think they care who win's and who loses? They all go out there and do their best! That's what GAMES are for!!!
It's a "game" and NOT a life threatening situation. Life is not fair and to act as though it is, is called 'dreaming'. A game is competition and to not do your best is to cheat the other players who are there to establish their capabilities vs others. I'm sure there are may different opinions about this, but just ask yourself what "a game" means to you. Athletes no longer play a game, it's now a business to them. They are paid for their performance and winning and losing are important. Remember, it's a game and you should be playing for the enjoyment of it. There are all kinds of ways of balancing games to further the playing enjoyment.

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 AM.