two v. two v. two v. two v. two (full)

[quantum_mechani]

Zooko said:
(b) -- explained -- I think that there is a wide demand for "balance" mods because the "All vs. All" format punishes aggression and leads to lots of lurking/hoarding/diplomacy. I think that the basic unmodded game is well-balanced for a contest in which there is a good reward for aggression, but not well-balanced for a game in which there is extended lurking/hoarding/diplomacy etc. before the aggression starts.

So I think for *this* game -- pentagon format -- that balance mods actually "unbalance" the game more than balance it.

But I decided to use Zen's mods just so I wouldn't have to argue with people about what mods to use. :-)

Fair enough. However, I like to argue so if will indulge me...

My mod is not to limit hoarding or any other tactic(well, almost, the one and only thing reduced in power is Caelum's mages, but almost everyone agrees they are overpowerd to some degree). It is it to open up strategies that would be highly inadvisable unmodified. When was the last time you purchased light cavalry? Or for that matter any troop with less than 10 armour and no special ability (flying, sacred, ranged troop, etc.)? Now, other mods have tried to do this, but they always ended up turning off players because they boosted things that were already used, and thus made them unbalanced (i.e., cherry's boosted white centaurs). I have tried to strictly limit myself to the obviously unused troops (in some cases I also made slight tweaks to mages of themes that were used, but the theme on the whole rated very low), and even then to only boost them in small steps.