data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
February 25th, 2004, 10:49 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 1,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: national armies?
Quote:
Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
quote: Originally posted by Zen:
I wouldn't vote for Satyr Hoplites (in their current form), they are useless. I'd say Centaur Warriors and Coral Guards for Atlantis.
|
But I dont think the AI does them that way. Isnt it more like lt troops, hvy troops, lt cavalry, hvy cavalry? Its just one AI. If the good thing for Ulm is hvy infantry over lt infantry then Pangaea and Atlantis get the same change dont they?
Of course if it goes to seperate AI's for each nation then all kinds of great strategies could be put in. If you just change the order to Hvy Inf, Hvy Cav, Lt Inf, Lt Cav it'll be OK IMHO - From what I've seen in MP this is more or less what 90% of players do ...
|