data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac9e/0ac9e1dfe343cf5428ff0343d77a84ffed848226" alt="Old"
December 23rd, 2003, 01:29 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7eec/b7eec862faee40470df422f3363ce83d5ddbbe24" alt="ywl's Avatar" |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 296
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Iron Faith Ulm
Quote:
Originally posted by PDF:
quote: Originally posted by ywl:
quote: Originally posted by PDF:
Ywl, some thoughts about yours
2/ I disagree on this one : as I've said I'm playing Ulm currently in MP with a RB, and did expand at the same rate than others- except one nasty Abysian SC (and played by Pocus !)
The standard Ulmish troops, with some Guardians for morale, some extra-ulmish archers, a merc band and a couple mages are enough.
|
I have the suspicion that you're not play with very aggressive players . Well, I don't know unless I can see your game. Let's use a benchmark - has anybody got 15 province by turn 11 to 12?
Mercenary of course could be big help to Ulm's expansion but you don't always get the good ones. As for the benchmark, we are under that - less than 10 provinces each - but the map only has some 56 provinces for 7 players, so ...
And I admit I was dreaming about IF magic scale - indeed Drain-1 is a req... this should kill the theme It's a very crowded map.
I don't have much experience. But I guess, if you got a bunch of cautious players, rainbow mage could be fine since you can fully utilize the gem income of each province.
Otherwise with such crowdiness, you should have total war by turn 15 already... You'll be in an very disadvantageous position without a combat pretender.
|