Beer game! EA - Signup Closed! - Page 23

Radioheart · #**221** December 10th, 2008, 01:19 AM

Err, hey yeah sorry about that. Still here though. Had a hard time getting a handle on the Van in this game, and I didn't mean to stale these past two turns. Just not much I can do with an income nearly all spent on upkeep and no real class A mages at hand.

Mostly making a turn wouldn't be so different from a stale, though I suspect Mictlan would've been battered by a half dozen more Blights.

Will try and work harder. Hah. Haven't looked at the newest turn yet, so hope there is still something to work with.

karnoza · #**222** December 10th, 2008, 04:00 AM

I can play for Van's.

WingedDog · #**223** December 10th, 2008, 04:27 AM

Slobby
karnoza is the player I PMed you about.

Slobby · #**224** December 10th, 2008, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrispedersen

AI after 2 stale, without contact.

Well looks like I'll have to be a hardass yet again. Radioheart while your subbing has been appreciated, you're out and Karnoza is in. Karnoza send me a pm with your email and I'll get you set up.

Note that I will most likely extend the current turn by 24-48 hours due to the time differences between Karnoza and I, so that he'll have a chance to familiarize himself with the position.

I apologize for the delay all, and appreciate your patience.

karnoza · #**225** December 11th, 2008, 05:59 AM

Greetings to all. As a sub I have some questions:
1. Can you write me here or through PM about current pacts with other nations?
2. I propose standart NAP 3 to everyone except Mictlan.

Executor · #**226** December 11th, 2008, 07:37 AM

Hahaha, why so hostile?

Executor · #**227** December 14th, 2008, 11:40 AM

So I guess this might be considered a World War against Mictlan ah?
So far 4 nations, who else might join???

This is really pathetic, 4 against 1 and yet you use exploits and break NAPs.

Vanheim, sneaking an army away from a siege is considered a exploit.

Slobby · #**228** December 14th, 2008, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Executor

Vanheim, sneaking an army away from a siege is considered a exploit.

I wouldn't consider moving stealth units out of a siege situation an exploit. I believe you were thinking of the bug reported in post 14 in the bug thread shortlist at the following link,

http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showt...t=33557&page=2

The movement of non stealth units led by a stealthy commander was the bug, which I would agree to be an exploit. However, it is reported as fixed. I've tried to reproduce it and cannot, so I can only assume Van led stealth units out, which I believe is WAD.

Executor · #**229** December 14th, 2008, 04:04 PM

Oh, my apologies you are correct, I misinterpreted that expoit. However I ever dislike NAP breakers and if you're gonna go 2,3,4 against one, you might at least have the courtesy to say, I declare war and wait those 3 turns. OR honer the NAP once you say: 'I declare war and will honer our NAP', and than attack before it ends. Those are low tactics.

JimMorrison · #**230** December 14th, 2008, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Executor

So I guess this might be considered a World War against Mictlan ah?
So far 4 nations, who else might join???

I just came as a representative from Caelum, in the Standards game. We are officially declaring war on Mictlan in this game.

Take that!