|
|
|
|
|
June 12th, 2002, 12:02 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
Quote:
I thought they had fixed it so that the "defending player" goes first which means the sats should go first.
|
MM thought so, too. However, from the beta history, v1.69:
Quote:
7. Fixed - AI was not always moving on the first turn of Tactical Combat
if it was the first player.
|
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|
June 12th, 2002, 02:49 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
Nice work WarDad
Seekers:
As far as I know the way a Multiplex or stacked units work:
All of the same weapon will fire at the same target untill destroyed.
Since the algorythm is:
Fire First CSM at First target
Is Target Destroyed? No (since the CSM has not reached it yet)
Fire 2nd CSM at First Target
Is Target destroyed? Nor (since the CSM has not reached it yet)
Repeat. It will fire all of the CSMs at the same target because it has not destroyed it yet.
Multiplex works with direct fire since a direct fire weapon might destroy the target befor the next one fires.
This implys that you should not expect Mutiplex results from Seekers.
|
June 12th, 2002, 06:29 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
High Gryphin,
Your basically right.
However SAT stack mutliple targeting can be improved by the strategy used. Only one strategy will be used, and it is from the first SAT design to fire.
So, if your stack was peppered with engine damage weapons or computer virus, you might want to use a Fastest targeting strategy.
If you had Null Space or Tachyon weapons, you might want to use a Strongest or Until Weapons Gone targeting strategy.
If you wanted to be a sneaky SOB, you could target vulnerable, unarmed support ships ;-)
etc...
Happy Hunting
__________________
So many ugly women, so little beer.
|
March 1st, 2004, 05:40 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
Bump
So, I wonder if the patches change anything?
[ March 01, 2004, 15:47: Message edited by: Wardad ]
__________________
So many ugly women, so little beer.
|
March 2nd, 2004, 05:35 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
Wardad said:
Quote:
IN EVERY TEST THE SHIPS MOVED AND FIRED FIRST.
|
I often use med. sats (small sats aren't worth a bucket of space) in large numbers and at warp point defense they always fire first for me. As long as there are targets in range.
But many times a large number of my sats don't fire at all! Now I know why. Guess I'll need about 20 different sat designs.
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|
March 2nd, 2004, 06:57 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
Quote:
Originally posted by Wardad:
I tested SATs with seekers next. Hot seat tactical-auto and strategic.
Strategic is different from tactical-auto. DEFENDERS FIRED FIRST IN STRATEGIC COMBAT.
I am now looking only at Strategic Combat with replay.
|
My later correction...
Simulater or Tactical-auto or Simultaneous (PBW) combat modes give the different results.
__________________
So many ugly women, so little beer.
|
March 2nd, 2004, 05:21 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
Sorry for dumb question, but does this mean that Mulitiplex tracking device on satellites is useless? And what about weapon platforms?
|
March 2nd, 2004, 06:54 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Satellites and multiple targets
Weapon platforms have a built in (hard-coded) multiplex tracking of 10. That means that each individidual platform can fire at at most 10 targets. Should be more than sufficient, requiring no use of multi-plex tracking. They fire their weapons individually, unlike fighter stacks. Not sure about satellites though.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|