|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
August 15th, 2006, 12:59 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Q about the AGM-142 \"Raptor\"
There is a weapon in both the USA and USMC Obats called the "AGM-142 Raptor" (weapon 214 in the USA Obat and 222 in the USMC Obat). It is a PGM commonly used by SEAD aircraft in both Obats. After reading this it doesn't seem to be a weapon designed for SEAD so I'm curious as to why the decision was made to make this the improved weapon for this role when the AGM-88 does not even have a successor in public development. I've noticed a number of inconsistancies with US SEAD aicraft in general, but I thought I'd pose this question as it is the one I find most curious.
|
August 15th, 2006, 09:27 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: Q about the AGM-142 \"Raptor\"
Popeye
SEAD planes can carry normal weapons (PGM, CBU, etc) as well as ARM.
Cheers
Andy
|
August 15th, 2006, 10:34 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Q about the AGM-142 \"Raptor\"
SEAD aircraft may carry normal weapons in addition or as substitutes to an ARM true, but the AGM-142 seems to be an interesting substitute seeing as currently the only carrier aircraft for the weapon in US service is the B-52H. I'm just curious as to how the AGM-142 was decided upon as the weapon to be modeled for this application.
|
August 15th, 2006, 01:41 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: Q about the AGM-142 \"Raptor\"
SEAD aircraft carry ARM - it is the whole point of the class, otherwise players get confused when ARM-equipped ordinary strike planes wander off from the intended target point and offload on a ZSU-23-4. No SPMBT SEAD planes have zero ARMs (until all expended, when they operate as normal strike planes of course). And having a separate class allows the AI to chose these types planes for SEAD tasks when picking forces as well.
As to why that particular missile is on that particular plane - you would need to ask the designer(s) of the USA OOBs over the last 5-6 years or so.
Cheers
Andy
|
August 15th, 2006, 05:13 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Q about the AGM-142 \"Raptor\"
Well in this case I'm confused. There is an ARM weapon class (weapon class 16). The AGM-142 is not a class 16 weapon (it is class 17, a PGM). Unit 920 in the USA Obat, an F-35 JSF which is a class 214 SEAD aicraft has a weapon load out of 1 27mm Bordkannon (a class 11 weapon; weapon number 195), 2 AGM-142 (a class 17 weapon; weapon number 214), and 2 sets of 2 500 lb Paveways (a class 17 weapon; weapon number 212). Thus we have a SEAD aircraft with no class 16 weapons. This is the same with units 587 and 904 (again both F-35 JSFs) in the USMC Obat.
The AGM-142 is not an ARM in real life nor is it an ARM in game, which means these aircraft are Class 214 SEAD aicraft with no ARMs.
|
August 15th, 2006, 06:39 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: Q about the AGM-142 \"Raptor\"
Which is a database error - we will need to adress this in the future patch.
Cheers
Andy
|
August 15th, 2006, 07:27 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Q about the AGM-142 \"Raptor\"
Okay, this is why I was confused. I'll just wait until the patch comes out to worry about any more of these issues. I'm sure a lot of these things will be corrected.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|