|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
July 15th, 2005, 04:52 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
I've played several assault battles vs AI, and I feel that AI using too many mines. It just cover all the battlefield , including victory hexex by mines. IMHO it makes the battle less fun:
1. It enforce primitive tactic - all the tactic is to claer mines to victory hexes, or air assault.
2. Because AI spending almoste all on mines it have not enough points to buy essential mobile forces - usually it have 3-4 tanks in the assault battle.
3. Because all the map covered by mines AI can't move and conterattack. Then trying move forces to regain captured hexes it just stuck in it's own mines.
My suggestions - decrease amount of mines 4-5 times, deploy them only on the roads/bridge/fords, around victory hexes and bunkers. Spend freed support point on the bunkers, mobile forces, ATGM, SAM, field and off-board artillery. The game will be a lot more fun, and no less challenging.
|
July 15th, 2005, 09:28 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
Just how many points are you using for these battles and how big is the map and what nations are you using??? All of that is critical information I need to investigate anything like this. Don't assume what you tried is universally true for the entire game for all the number of combinations available to set up an assualt
A 25,000 point assault does not generate enough mines for the AI defender to "cover all the battlefield" on a 100x100 map, not even close so I need to know what you set up your game for
Don
|
July 15th, 2005, 10:45 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
I'm playing generated campin, I'm getting 4500-6000 points for core force.
The size of map - I have nothing compare to, it's a standart map generated by campain. By "all the map covered by mines" I don't mean that every hex covered by mine, but all AI area covered by the strips of mines from top to bottom, with gap of around 3-4 hexes between strips.
|
July 15th, 2005, 11:37 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
PavelI have had the same results when playing a generated campaign. Playing 7000 point games I am finding the unending mine fields to be a real pain. Also the changes from the older games on mines makes them much harder to clear.
Someone suggested that you should use engineers to clear them. How?!? Every time the engineers move they are torn to pieces. And the inf in their dug in positions are almost unsuppress-able. (when you have a MRLS barrage hit one, then hit it with the fire of 10 tanks and support vech at 200 meters and it still kills half of the first engineer platoon who moves, one hex, at 600 meters something is wrong. Lots and lots of smoke is the only chance for engineers and then the small mortars kill and suppress most of them so that they can not remove mines. My MRLS and 155mm accurate barrages don�t even make them duck!) Mine removing tanks are the only units that can take the super accurate small arms fire and still remove mines. But with out full terrain info with mouse over, like in the earlier versions of SP, means that you loose most of your mine tanks to trackings after they stumble into a mine field.
The tedious and over costly assaults on the generated campaigns is ruining the most stable and weapons rich version of SP yet! It�s a shame.
|
July 15th, 2005, 03:26 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
Quote:
serg3d said:
I'm playing generated campin, I'm getting 4500-6000 points for core force.
The size of map - I have nothing compare to, it's a standart map generated by campain. By "all the map covered by mines" I don't mean that every hex covered by mine, but all AI area covered by the strips of mines from top to bottom, with gap of around 3-4 hexes between strips.
|
There is no "Standard" map generated by a campaign. You have total control of the map size in preferences when you start the campaign along with how many points for the core. ( you can also change the map sizes between games if you want ) You can tell me how big it is by starting your campaign and place your cursor over the extreme lower right side of the map and reading the map co-ordinates that appear at the top of the screen. That will say something like "Hex 99,79" which indicates the map is set to 80/100 in preferences
Mine removal is covered in the game guide under Mines and Field Engineering. If you still have trouble after reading that perhaps one of the other players on the list can help you with this. A 4500-6000 point core with a medium sized map shouldn't be generating an impossible number of mines for you to deal with
Don
|
July 15th, 2005, 03:40 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
Quote:
Pavel said:
PavelI have had the same results when playing a generated campaign. Playing 7000 point games I am finding the unending mine fields to be a real pain. Also the changes from the older games on mines makes them much harder to clear.
Someone suggested that you should use engineers to clear them. How?!? Every time the engineers move they are torn to pieces. And the inf in their dug in positions are almost unsuppress-able. (when you have a MRLS barrage hit one, then hit it with the fire of 10 tanks and support vech at 200 meters and it still kills half of the first engineer platoon who moves, one hex, at 600 meters something is wrong. Lots and lots of smoke is the only chance for engineers and then the small mortars kill and suppress most of them so that they can not remove mines. My MRLS and 155mm accurate barrages don�t even make them duck!) Mine removing tanks are the only units that can take the super accurate small arms fire and still remove mines. But with out full terrain info with mouse over, like in the earlier versions of SP, means that you loose most of your mine tanks to trackings after they stumble into a mine field.
The tedious and over costly assaults on the generated campaigns is ruining the most stable and weapons rich version of SP yet! It�s a shame.
|
If your engineers are being "torn to pieces" you are not surpressing the defences enough with arty and smoke ( yes, I did read what you wrote about your attempts to surpress the dug in defenders and I KNOW they *can* be surpressed ). Mine removal is covered in the game guide under "Mines and Field Engineering" you do NOT remove mines with engineers and mine clearing tanks by moving INTO the mined hex. You do that by staying just outside the minefield with the engineers or engineer tanks and point them at the mined hex then let them work and give them full support while they do their work.
If you still find this not to your liking you can always turn mines off in preferences and they will be deactivated when you play assualts but I'm sure there will be other players willing to offer you suggestions on how to deal with them. They CAN be dealt with.
Don
|
July 15th, 2005, 03:48 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
Smoke is the engineer squads friend. A 120mm plt with smoke is worth more than a MLRS. Of course 8 inch fire will supress anyone.
BTW what nations are you playing. I have run into this against the Chinese in 2006 and at 30000 points.
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|
July 16th, 2005, 12:10 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
and the map size would be good info to know as well..
Don
|
July 16th, 2005, 02:02 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
�Mine removal is covered in the game guide under "Mines and Field Engineering" you do NOT remove mines with engineers and mine clearing tanks by moving INTO the mined hex. You do that by staying just outside the minefield with the engineers or engineer tanks and point them at the mined hex then let them work and give them full support while they do their work�
We are not communicating. I have read the mine and field engineering rules. I have played SP since it came out, all versions. This is the first version that it doesn�t tell you �Mine Present� when you mouse over and you can see the mines. Sometimes your tank is on top of the hex with mines.
I know that you clear mines from one hex out WHEN YOU SEE THEM!!!!!
When your mine clearing tank finds the mind field by driving into it you are stuck there until you get tired of waiting. IF you are lucky you will see the msg that the follow on mine clearers and the stuck tank have cleared the field. Only sometime you miss the msg and discover that the hex was not cleared because when you move your tank it is tracked. The tank itself covers the single mine so you can�t tell that the hex is cleared or not till you leave the hex or you have a slightly smoking immobilized take to mark the hex.
On the Engineering units, they are meat in the open and his mortars seem to hit them every turn so even with battle field taxies (APC or Choppers) once they are deployed, even behind huge smoke screens, his small arty keeps them too suppressed to do much good.
I am playing a 20 game campaign as Brits against China, NK, and Iran, 2005-2015, mostly desert. Standard size maps. I have added enough to my core I might have 10,000 points in play now. As the Brits I don�t get anything bigger than 155mm arty. So I go with MRLS (it kills soft skins and is rough on Inf in the open) and 105mm for my smoke missions and pin-point suppressive fire. (mortars don�t have enough ammo for the long mission it is to burn through 25 hexes of mines with supporting mortar fire.) I buy as many drones as I can to burn up his SAMS and give my air mobile troops a chance to get a few victory hexes. (when his troops come out of their holes I can hurt them.) My MRLS are part of my core unit. With my support points I get Challenger 2 MPs, Drones and 105mm batteries. I have lowered their accuracy down to 50 and the T-62s only get one drone a pass now. His SAMs can�t hit my drones but are death on my Choppers. If I let the smoke get too thin his Inf kill any soft skinned tracks at 600meters or less, normally the turn the smoke is thinned.
I have all the settings to run the game as fast as it will run.
I mostly like the game for the generated campaign games. I like building and maintaining my fighting unit. I really love that I can add to my core in this version. Very very nice. The assaults against the 25+ hex of mine belts are just a little tedious and frustrating.
Pavel
|
July 16th, 2005, 02:10 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arkansas, USA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault vs AI - too many mines ?
BTW my map size is 98-78. The default I guess.
Pavel
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|