|
|
|
|
|
November 1st, 2003, 04:50 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
Here are some suggested game improvements which would really add depth and character value to the game.
Pick your top 3 Favorites... personally I feel they should all be added to improve the game.
[ November 01, 2003, 14:50: Message edited by: NTJedi ]
__________________
There can be only one.
|
November 1st, 2003, 04:58 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
It doesnt seem to let you pick zero choices.
All of these seem interesting but to discuss but are you asking if we want Illwinter to work on these NOW? Or sometime way in the future? If its way in the future then it doesnt need a vote, just discussion IMHO
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
November 1st, 2003, 05:03 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
These are all suggestions that should be worked on now... if not sooner.
Some of these could be added quickly... others may take months of progamming before seeing a patch. I believe all would make the game better.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
November 1st, 2003, 06:20 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
You could have all the gods you want allready, you just have to manually do it. It worked in Dom1 at least and I see no reason it wouldn't in two...
Also later in the game you can use wish, and gift of reason to start pumping out your own minigods.
|
November 1st, 2003, 07:25 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
I think that there are a lot of other items to be looked at befre these.
Other than the one AI suggestion (AI personalities) I would rather see Illwinter work on what THEY think is most important.
Sammual
|
November 1st, 2003, 07:29 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
The only one suggestion that isn't a significant change to the gameplay (and one geared toward making the game more "RPGish") is the one about battle details, which I picked. The others, IMHO, don't have much to do here; they would turn DomII away from its strategy focus.
|
November 1st, 2003, 07:42 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
One of these suggestions is partially already in the game. A spell (or perhaps a few spells) allows you to promote a regular unit into a Commander. (Gift of Reason, level 4 Thaumaturgy, needs 4 in Nature)
I would be reluctant to call some of the other changes "improvements", as they could lead to many problems on their own. (I am especially thinking of the several Gods suggestion among others)
|
November 4th, 2003, 09:35 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
bumping topic
perhaps the developers could give feedback on what features appear to be good ideas for future patches... or expansions.
[ November 04, 2003, 07:36: Message edited by: NTJedi ]
__________________
There can be only one.
|
November 4th, 2003, 10:03 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
Quote:
Originally posted by PhilD:
... The others, IMHO, don't have much to do here; they would turn DomII away from its strategy focus.
|
I second this.
Most suggestions would turn DOM into a completly different game.
A.
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|
November 4th, 2003, 08:49 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggested Game Improvements ~vote~
True for some, and others if not balanced well, though others are good general suggestions (e.g. more casualty detail available).
The "quest" idea could work if the reward were unlikely to exceed the effort (a bit like the current arena event - just a different twist).
The "Blazing Commander" seems a bit excessive and the mechanic to not quite make sense, though the general idea of a commander well-buffed for one battle, after which he dies, would be no less interesting nor more powerful than many high-level armor-blitzing spells, if balanced with them in mind. I kind of like the idea - if balanced well and with a mechanic more refined than "double all stats" (which I assume was just an example). The general suggestion was just "add more spells", which I imagine Illwinter will continue to do anyway, if and when they have an idea they like, and which is worth programming the effects and AI decisions about when to use them or not. I can already imagine complaints about the "dumb" AI killing its (or their) own commanders with this spell, when to them it seemed obvious they'd win the battle easily, etc.
Occasional attacks from independents might be interesting... though this actually already happens, in the form of independent "uprisings". Just add an event that calls an "uprising" an attack, and perhaps uses the troop type of a nearby independent province, and you've just (fairly easily) added some interesting color without changing the way the game balance works.
Hmm - back to work.
PvK
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|