|
|
|
|
|
December 4th, 2003, 05:36 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
does gravity have waves?
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
December 4th, 2003, 06:26 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 464
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
Quote:
Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
does gravity have waves?
|
Probably, but they have not been detected (proven) yet.
__________________
I thought of the sun as a big bright ball of something that produced an intense absence of darkness. Alan Dean Foster No More Crystal Tears
A++SeGdy$+-++Fr?C++++Cst+SfAi--Mm-MpTS---SsROPw++Fq++Nd++++RpG++Mm++Bb
|
December 4th, 2003, 08:33 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA
Posts: 921
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
I just want to put Mr. Fusion on the back of my Delorean to power the flux capacitor. Is that asking so much?
__________________
My SEIV Code: L++++ GdY $ Fr+++ C-- S* T? Sf Tcp A%% M+++ MpT RV Pw+ Fq Nd- RP+ G++ Au+ Mm++(--)
Ursoids of the Galaxy, unite!
|
December 4th, 2003, 09:08 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 626
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
Yes.
Mr. Fission is the king of miniaturization.
You can probably make incredibly small fission reactors that would work and produce energy. So long as you have a way to get rid of the waste products that is.
Mr. Fusion is the king of make it big. I doubt you could ever make a stable energy yielding fusion reaction that would fit in a car.
Let's not mention the flux capacitor and the probability of time travel.
[ December 04, 2003, 19:08: Message edited by: Cyrien ]
__________________
Oh hush, or I'm not going to let you alter social structures on a planetary scale with me anymore. -Doggy!
|
December 5th, 2003, 12:56 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
Hmm Mr fusion may not be practical but, there is a table top device that can do small scale fusion reactions, it s for research applications. Unfortunately I don't remember all the details of the article.
As for the Unified theory, they have combined and confirmed in the lab the equations for Electromagnetism and the Weak Nuclear force a few years back. a detail that was mentioned recently on progress of some other research.
HE3 all I can really remember on that is that it solved some problems dealing with plasma densities required for reactions and such.
Their are several fusion reactor designs, funny thing is some are not actually new, just that computing technology has reached a point where the calculations required are now possible. Read about that in "Computing in Science and Engineering". Reactor design was referred to as a stellarator proposed back in the 50's.
As for fusion propulsion, I can't remember what the design was called but a reactor Soviet era design had some deficient that actually lent itself to propulsive use. The containment fields were weak at the ends, not desirable for a power reactor but if your looking for thrust.......
|
December 5th, 2003, 01:33 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
Hmm Mr fusion may not be practical but, there is a table top device that can do small scale fusion reactions, it s for research applications. Unfortunately I don't remember all the details of the article."
Yes, you can. Unfortunately there's a bit of a detail you missed..it takes more energy than it produces!
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
December 5th, 2003, 02:09 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 626
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
Yep. That is why bigger is better with fusion. In order to start it up you need really strong lasers in order to contain it you need a super strong magnetic field. All this takes energy. So the key is to get a big enough fusion reaction so that the amount of energy you put out is greater than that which you put in. IE: You need size. You get larger and larger energy outputs and the energy required to start it remains static and the energy required for containment increases much much slower than the output. In addition you want to reach ignition or very close to it for maximum energy output. Ignition means you no longer need outside energy input to sustain the reaction. It is a self sustaining reaction. This requires size. When was the Last time you saw a small star?
You can have all the small fusion reactions you want. You just won't get any more energy from it than you put in, not unless you can figure out how to A> Start it without using lots of energy B> Contain it without using lots of energy C> Get a low level ignition or near ignition.
While A and B might eventually be overcome C itself defies our understanding of physics and thus can be considered impossible, at least in our lifetimes I would bet.
Thus no small fusion reactions to power things like cars etc... at least not directly.
Use a battery charge it using plentiful fusion energy and then run a car on that.
__________________
Oh hush, or I'm not going to let you alter social structures on a planetary scale with me anymore. -Doggy!
|
December 5th, 2003, 02:12 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
should have cleared up one thing when I said research purposes, it was not energy related.
i did say, not practical, not immpossible.
|
December 5th, 2003, 02:17 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
Right - the point is to have a fusion device in your car just to be cool, and what better than an energy-reducing device, to be cool...
PvK
|
December 5th, 2003, 02:19 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: France
Posts: 664
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: fusion is getting SOOOO close -> then comes fusion engines!!! ::P muhuhahah(no j
I don't think fusion is going to bring on a new sort of engines. I think Energy Unification theory will.
That means, physicians think all energy are linked. If you are able to understand the way it works, then you can alter one energy into another.
For instance, you could creat a magnetic wave and transform it into gravity wave.
does gravitic engine rings a bell ?
[ December 04, 2003, 12:21: Message edited by: Unknown_Enemy ]
__________________
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wagh'nagl fhtagn.
�a ! �a ! Cthulhu fhtagn ! Cthulhu fhtagn !
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|