|
|
|
|
|
August 30th, 2003, 12:59 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Distances in SE IV
How can I calculate the distance between star systems so I�ll know which GQR level I need to open a WP to the desired system...
So: how far is "one square distance" ?
thanks
__________________
Quid pro quo <img border=0 title= alt=[Wink] src=wink.gif /]
|
August 30th, 2003, 04:09 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
Yep, 1 square=10 LY, according to the manual.
|
August 30th, 2003, 04:56 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
And don't forget your Pythagorean Theorem!
True Distance = SQRT( horizontal2 + vertical2 )
__________________
Things you want:
|
August 31st, 2003, 01:36 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 1,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
If I recall correctly one square is 10 light years.
__________________
For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's futures. And we are all mortal. - JFK
|
October 7th, 2003, 04:45 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas, yall
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
What about distance on the tactical map?
|
October 7th, 2003, 05:02 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
That is a totally relative value, and there is no set real value for it.
|
October 7th, 2003, 02:49 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brazil
Posts: 827
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
In fact, if you want the system maps to be even moderately realistic, you have to assume that the squares represent a greater distance towards the edges than near the center.
__________________
Have you ever had... the sudden feeling... that God is out to GET YOU?
Well, my girl dumped me and I'm stuck with the raftmates from Hell in the middle of the sea and... what was the question again???
|
October 7th, 2003, 03:30 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
In order to regard the squares on the system or tactical map as realistic I've felt that they could not be assumed to correspond to distances.
I think it is best to think that the X- and Y-Axis do not represent anything like an X- or Y-Axis in space, but rather various aspects of an orbit, distance and speed. We don't have to know what those aspects specifically are, because I think we'd be hard pressed to get something that fits exactly.
This would explain why 'thrust' appears to provide 'movement' and not 'acceleration'. If velocity is already figured into the sectors, then acceleration would just move you from sector to sector at a constant rate. Still, QNP makes more sense than stock propulsion.
This would also fit with the way that a one-sector asteroid collection is labeled an 'asteroid belt', as that one sector comprises a whole orbit. As well, this fits with the way that the planets do not move.
|
October 7th, 2003, 04:00 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
If you're wondering "How far is a square?",
and other science facts,
just repeat to yourself "It's just a game -
I should really just relax."
|
October 7th, 2003, 04:48 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Distances in SE IV
In this group!?!
Hah!
You make laugh-funny.
And while we're on the "We Didn't Really Ask Why?" program, allow me to add this.
Missiles don't just stop, or otherwise explode, when they reach the edge of their range. What they do is they run out of maneuvering fuel. Once that runs out, the missile is very unlikely to hit its target. In fact, it doesn't hit its target. Remember that space is very, very big. Missiles and ships are both very, very small.
Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|