|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
March 10th, 2017, 04:58 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Scenario 350
Not one to pick holes but decided to try some of the new scenarios & this one has issues. After first turn I switched my side to computer controlled to see what happened & it ended on turn 3 or 4.
First unit I killed with op fire was HQ unit & the transport it was in.
Loaded in to editor & don't think its worth tinkering defender outnumbers attacker by 3 to 1.
__________________
John
|
March 10th, 2017, 05:59 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario 350
I do not playtest every scenario that goes into the game. I leave that to the designer and if there is a problem it's up to the designer to issue a correction.All I do is make sure there are no issues related to any OOB changes I may have made. But this one does indeed have the defenders point total 3x the attackers so I guess it's an easy beginners sceanrio....though IDK if that was the intention
|
March 10th, 2017, 02:31 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario 350
May also be intended to be part of a campaign where attrition matters rather then a stand-alone scenario. I'm trying to do something similar.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
March 10th, 2017, 03:15 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario 350
Look at it another way.....it'd be a real challenge to play from P2 for an experienced player.
I simply CANNOT playtest every scenario so if this is missing something ( like the rest of the campaign for example ) then Al's going to have to supply it
|
March 11th, 2017, 08:24 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
Look at it another way.....it'd be a real challenge to play from P2 for an experienced player.
|
I tested that theory a bit yesterday while waiting for an upload to complete and the results were not good. If a fix isn't provided for this I will replace it next year. Right now all it offers is a shooting gallery for player one for a few turns
|
April 4th, 2017, 01:00 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 26
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario 350
I was surprised this scenario made it in as an official scenario - there's absolutely no challenge. You just sit and shoot. But it'd be a nice first round for a long campaign, because Team Yankee would make a great campaign.
(Without actually firing up the game, I'm assuming we're talking about the "Team Yankee First Battle" scenario).
|
April 4th, 2017, 07:16 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Scenario 350
It got in because I didn't have time to test it completely. It will be removed and replaced next year
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|