|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
February 27th, 2012, 06:10 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
Quote:
704 SU-76M - ammo load should be 31 HE, 19 AP, 10 according to J. Kajetanowicz. Maybe SMG could be added for self-defence? (there were carried one or two).
|
Fittings (ammo racks etc.) for a DP LMG were present, it was mounted on the cover rod or on the wall. I don't know how often it was used in practice though.
|
February 27th, 2012, 06:13 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pibwl
053 7.62 SGMT AAMG - Soviet designation of AAMG variant was SGMB.
|
.......and that is the TENTH time this has been brought up un the last 3 months ( yep.... 9 times already in the "done" notes and now this time...10 total )
|
Sorry
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
Now please......take a break and wait to see what the OOB in the patch looks like before commenting further.
Also.....I am well aware of the "useless" weapons, anyone who knows how to run the MOBHack database check utilities can find the unused weapons in the OOB. I can removed them or leave them alone, they have no affect on the game
|
Yes, I'm taking a break.
I was writing about useless weapons to mark, that they are used by units, that are still present(?) in the file, although they may be renationalized or whatever - and these weapons might be changed to something similar in the future.
Regards,
Michal
|
February 27th, 2012, 06:49 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pibwl
902-904 Gun Truck... - to be removed, with removal of Hiena.
That's all as for now.
Michal
|
Yes, Michal, of course Michal, that is what is done automatically when the only unit in that class is removed from an OOB. I do not need to be told this. It is redundant information.
I have to admit though this does top telling me when a unit should get a desert Icon........
Don
Last edited by DRG; February 27th, 2012 at 07:02 PM..
|
February 27th, 2012, 06:57 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pibwl
I was writing about useless weapons to mark, that they are used by units, that are still present(?) in the file, although they may be renationalized or whatever - and these weapons might be changed to something similar in the future.
Regards,
Michal
|
Yes Michal, but I can find the unused ones anytime I need a weapons slot by clicking one button and reading the list and , if I so desire I can remove all the unused one with a click of a button as well but I tend to avoid doing that until it's necessary because it can complicate correcting scenarios and I don't need any further complications this time around.
Don
|
February 13th, 2015, 04:09 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,297 Times in 973 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
Well this was the first Polish only Thread I came to. I say now Ukraine, Poland and to a lesser extent Finland, Norway and Sweden (If still on track, they should be combining for their own version of "NATO" this Spring.) are going to be the countries to watch in Europe over the next decade in light of Russia's current activities. But the first two will be the most important not withstanding the truce just agreed to yesterday between Ukraine and Russia. Though I try to take a world view in equipment submissions especially for the unrepresented OOB's in the game I can't ignore world events and treads that I believe my record is built on. So I'm back to Poland with the following...
http://www.janes.com/article/48589/p...ment-programme
Polish defense issues in depth are covered in this video interview for instance ALL T-72 tanks planned for removal by 2021 and PT-91 Series by I believe was said 2025. It's worth the view especially for the "Go Poland" group however this should not in of itself constitute a mad rush for OOB submissions or changes.
Regards,
Pat
__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
|
March 10th, 2015, 04:51 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 359
Thanks: 56
Thanked 136 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
Polish Rosomak (plain, M1) seems to have incorrect armour values. Rosomak, AFAIK, is the IFV version and not the APC version with the exception of M3 and ATGM versions. Incidentally, Finnish AMV Patria APC has the IFV configuration armor values and I believe they should be the other way around. Also Rosomak is too heavy to swim and probably has less speed than current one (36:2).
Rosomak, default (bump up for M1M which got additional steel-composite armor as well as the RPG nets)
steel: 12-4-3-5-4-4-2
heat: 15-10-5-15-10-10-2
AMV Patria APC:
steel: 5-4-3-5-4-3-2
heat: 0's
|
March 13th, 2015, 09:08 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 359
Thanks: 56
Thanked 136 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmnt
Polish Rosomak (plain, M1) seems to have incorrect armour values. Rosomak, AFAIK, is the IFV version and not the APC version with the exception of M3 and ATGM versions. Incidentally, Finnish AMV Patria APC has the IFV configuration armor values and I believe they should be the other way around. Also Rosomak is too heavy to swim and probably has less speed than current one (36:2).
|
I have to backpedal on this an admit that I had wrong information.
Finnish AMV has 24.5 (metric) tn weight, Rosomaks up to 22.8 tn. Finnish variant this has better armor around it.
|
March 13th, 2015, 01:28 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,493
Thanks: 3,965
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: Polish OOB 5.5
If I'd ignored your post the first time around I wouldn't have to change everything back now....... Consider that lesson now learned
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|