|
|
|
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:12 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BF Illinois
Posts: 445
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
I got that he doesn't like Sombre... or that Sombre is his opponent... but he did still ask a question about what to do... so... no, I don't...
__________________
"Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt." -- Sun Tzu
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:13 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 510
Thanks: 24
Thanked 31 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maerlande
Ahh, well it's only wasting your time if you are stupid enough to read it and reply and fail to understand the real meaning of the entire thread. But I'd never call you stupid. That's a banning offence.
|
As I am not, unfortunately, possessed of telepathic abilities, the odds of understanding your "real meaning of the entire thread", which appears to be something completely different from what you actually posted in your first post (or relies on information only known to a subset of the posting population), are low to non-existent.
Cross-indexing against your other posts on this forum might give me a hint as to what you are really talking about, but that really is no fitting replacement for choosing an appropriate subject and posting the thing you want to discuss in the original post of a thread. This includes giving sufficient information in the original post that people can discuss what you really want to talk about. If this (as Graeme Dice seems to suggest) is a particular game with constraints relevant to that game, the appropriate act would to either discuss it in a thread already dedicated to that game or to indicate the relevant constraints when you post in the general discussion forum.
Failing that, you can act like a real smeg-head, though I'd never call you a smeghead. That might a banning offense (depending on the amount of Red Dwarf sympathizers amongst the moderaters).
__________________
When I said Death before Dishonour, I meant alphabetically.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Peter Ebbesen For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:13 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 564
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Hmmm, this helps a bit to explain the preference for expensive powerful mages over cheap mages. It could be worthwhile to add 5gem armor to a 250 gold mage. Definitely not for an 80 gold mage.
I guess my reverse-communion EA Ermor Augur Astral Fires strategy won't work in MP -- a rain-of-stones would easily kill it.
Your best strategy is to keep attacking him with 25 yogi armies until he runs out of gems for rain-of-stones.
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:14 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tacoma WA, USA
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 103
Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
ROFL
Incomprehension is lolworthy.
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:14 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verjigorm
I got that he doesn't like Sombre
|
no
Quote:
... or that Sombre is his opponent...
|
no
Quote:
but he did still ask a question about what to do...
|
no
yes
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:16 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ebbesen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maerlande
Ahh, well it's only wasting your time if you are stupid enough to read it and reply and fail to understand the real meaning of the entire thread. But I'd never call you stupid. That's a banning offence.
|
As I am not, unfortunately, possessed of telepathic abilities, the odds of understanding your "real meaning of the entire thread", which appears to be something completely different from what you actually posted in your first post (or relies on information only known to a subset of the posting population), are low to non-existent.
Cross-indexing against your other posts on this forum might give me a hint as to what you are really talking about, but that really is no fitting replacement for choosing an appropriate subject and posting the thing you want to discuss in the original post of a thread. This includes giving sufficient information in the original post that people can discuss what you really want to talk about. If this (as Graeme Dice seems to suggest) is a particular game with constraints relevant to that game, the appropriate act would to either discuss it in a thread already dedicated to that game or to indicate the relevant constraints when you post in the general discussion forum.
Failing that, you can act like a real smeg-head, though I'd never call you a smeghead. That might a banning offense (depending on the amount of Red Dwarf sympathizers amongst the moderaters).
|
Peter Ebbesen, I suggest you lighten up. People have been banned from these forums for being sombre, you know.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to vfb For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:18 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BF Illinois
Posts: 445
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Thank you for wasting my time on some insipid foolishness.
__________________
"Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt." -- Sun Tzu
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:20 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
guys, you're making fun of people whose first language isn't english, and who'se only offense was trying to be helpful.
I understand that people are frustrated - but I don't think thats a profitable or appropriate response.
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:27 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 104
Thanks: 3
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
To get back on topic, your problem is that even though you're using hundred mage armies, your strategy is too diverse. Moderation will only get you a seat at life's loser table. You need to commit to your course and never stray, regardless of the consequences.
It's like the old quote .. "All things in moderation, including moderation."
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:27 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrispedersen
guys, you're making fun of people whose first language isn't english, and who'se only offense was trying to be helpful.
I understand that people are frustrated - but I don't think thats a profitable or appropriate response.
|
There is no proper or appropriate response, the mods are taking a sombre mood to further discussion of the subject.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VFB
Peter Ebbesen, I suggest you lighten up. People have been banned from these forums for being Sombre, you know.
|
Fixed.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|