Clam Shortage? - Big Singleage CBM game! - Page 4

Xanatos · #31 December 25th, 2009, 10:25 AM

I agree, not equivalent, though perhaps complimentary, These settings are not set in stone guys, lets get the folks and then decide which settings people want.

Fantomen · #32 December 25th, 2009, 01:21 PM

I'm in.

LA Caelum

Tollund · #33 December 25th, 2009, 01:25 PM

I'll play MA Caelum

Aethyr · #34 December 25th, 2009, 01:48 PM

I vote for graphs on.

Also, how do folks feel about changing the victory condition to "x" capitols held for "x" number of turns?

Fantomen · #35 December 25th, 2009, 08:22 PM

No to graphs.

Yes to some kind of victory condition, but there should also be the alternative to win through concession.

Alpine Joe · #36 December 25th, 2009, 11:19 PM

I'd like to play in this as LA abysia. I would prefer graphs on, and a small boost to magic sites.

AreaOfEffect · #37 December 26th, 2009, 01:33 AM

I'm a fan of more magic sites.

I care not for what the graphs do.

I've always wanted to play a game with dominion-based victory condition.

Festin · #38 December 26th, 2009, 04:40 AM

I'd like to take LA Jomon please.

Yes to graphs, yes to magic site boost. Agree to "x" capitols held for "x" number of turns, if "x" is quite big )

Dimaz · #39 December 26th, 2009, 06:24 AM

Gath if CBM.
LA Ctis if vanilla.

Strabo · #40 December 30th, 2009, 07:15 AM

I'm in
MA Pythium