MP VS League - Page 8

Executor · #71 July 13th, 2009, 05:08 AM

GB, was that directed at me? I don't mind taking Marverni if you wanna play.

If you don't, is there someone else interested in a 1 on 1?

Dragar · #72 July 13th, 2009, 09:28 AM

so tempting, i really shouldn't take on any more games though, sorry

GrudgeBringer · #73 July 13th, 2009, 03:02 PM

Yeah Executer, I have a new build on Arco and would like to try it agianst one of the best (that be you).

I still don't think I would win but I might put up a good fight with this build and playing with/agianst you has always had me going away learing something.

If you want to play (remember I am computer challenged) let me know and we can set it up.

BTW, that wasn't a smart A** challenge, it was just directed at a friend.

GrudgeBringer · #74 July 13th, 2009, 03:22 PM

DarkSha, I have NO thought that EA Arco is in any way a powerhouse. In fact with me at the helm I should get a running start whoever I played.

I think your Idea is great on a ladder, but I am not that versed on many nations and I think there is a LOT of people who would love to play 1 on 1 but not agianst a really good player playing a powerhouse Nation.

There was a ladder called Leadeaters about 8 years ago (had to do with stratgy games across a broad spectrum) and they assigned points for the particular battle you where going to play, side you took and skill levels.

I played Cilvil War Generals 2, but there where a number of games involved in this 'Ladder' all mixed together with points for battles, Draws, Minor wins, and Major wins (likewise you took points off for the same losses).

It also factored in WHO you where playing so If a General played a privite and got a major win he might get 20 point....iF the privite won, he might get 100.

(Eveyone started as a reruit and went up the ranks..Privite, corporal ect)

It was a different era and differnt type of games as they where mostly tactical and there certainly was no magic. But the premise remains the same.

I don't get to toot my horn very often but I retired as the only 5tar General they ever had ( As I siad it was mostly on one game CWG2 and there where only 2 sides to take so it wasn;t that big of a deal, but it was to me at the time).

You might look at this post and see if there is something you could take out of it that would make EVERYONE feel like it was worthwhile to play Executor ect.

Also you might want to set up games like Marverni agianst Arco..or perhaps Mictlan agianst Pangea ect...

Just an opinion.

Squirrelloid · #75 July 13th, 2009, 03:48 PM

Grudge:
The chess-style system does take into consideration relative skill levels as measured by current ranking. Of course, it requires playing a number of games for your ranking to accurately reflect your skill level, but the chess system does everything you're asking.

GrudgeBringer · #76 July 13th, 2009, 04:25 PM

Point well taken!!!

Executor · #77 July 13th, 2009, 05:49 PM

GB, that's great news.
You have mail, let's get start this game!

DakaSha · #78 July 13th, 2009, 11:29 PM

yeah GB we will be using a modified chess system

Psycho · #79 July 19th, 2009, 07:12 PM

I am up for a duel. Anybody interested?

DakaSha · #80 July 19th, 2009, 07:41 PM

you might have to create a separate thread. dont know if people really check this