|
|
|
|
|
November 15th, 2003, 10:34 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Ermor
Playing Ulm. Steel Faith. Against Ermor (those undead guys).
Some of the provinces I'm taking over have only a few hundred population. How do I get the population back up? Or can't I? I don't have growth domain, so....
|
November 15th, 2003, 11:27 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Ermor
Too bad for you.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
November 15th, 2003, 11:41 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Ermor
By design, Ermor has a dominion that kills off the population very quickly, leaving them worthless in terms of gold income and supply. That's one of their main strengths, since they don't need either. Growth scale wouldn't help you much - it's only 0.2% growth per turn per tick, so it's only noticeable in provinces with high population base. In other words, you are stuck with it. Here is a guide that might help you in dealing with Ermor as a novice player (it's for Doms I, but many things will still apply).
http://illwinter.com/defeat_ermor.html
[ November 15, 2003, 21:42: Message edited by: HJ ]
|
November 16th, 2003, 12:30 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 1,221
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Ermor
Quote:
Originally posted by HJ:
By design, Ermor has a dominion that kills off the population very quickly, leaving them worthless in terms of gold income and supply. That's one of their main strengths, since they don't need either. Growth scale wouldn't help you much - it's only 0.2% growth per turn per tick, so it's only noticeable in provinces with high population base. In other words, you are stuck with it. Here is a guide that might help you in dealing with Ermor as a novice player (it's for Doms I, but many things will still apply).
http://illwinter.com/defeat_ermor.html
|
I think that there should be spells like summon population. Why not? This is a fantasy wargame afterall! All things should have some counter, that is the key.
Now we dont have counter when Ermor kills the pop, we cannot remove curse, and the curse spell is so cheap, Ermor cannot defend against turn undead..etc.
Frankly, some things are totally unbalanced.
__________________
Dominions 3. Wallpapers & Logos
-------
"Training is principally an act of faith. The athlete must believe in its efficacy: he must believe that through training he will become fitter and stronger, that by constant repetition of the same movements he will become more skillful."
|
November 16th, 2003, 01:14 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor
Quote:
Originally posted by DominionsFAN:
I think that there should be spells like summon population. Why not? This is a fantasy wargame afterall! All things should have some counter, that is the key.
Now we dont have counter when Ermor kills the pop, we cannot remove curse, and the curse spell is so cheap, Ermor cannot defend against turn undead..etc.
Frankly, some things are totally unbalanced.
|
Actually, it seems to me that having everything have a way to undo it, is more like generic rock-paper-scissors than "key". I think it's actually more interesting when some situations can't be undone, or not easily.
I would enjoy having, say, an item and/or spell that protects against getting cursed, and a costly way to remove a curse, but I don't think curses are unbalanced, because they just make afflictions more likely. That is actually an interesting counter-balance to super-combattants. The reason I'd like protection or (especially) removal options is just for roleplaying and my preferred play style of trying to keep experienced fighters alive.
I also enjoy the lack of easy ways to repopulate provinces for similar reasons - it's an interesting effect that adds flavor, and part of the interest is that it is hard to undo. I suppose it would be interesting if there were some difficult/rare ways to do this, perhaps by relocating population rather than making people appear out of thin air, or slowly through high-level nature magic or something (there is already Wish, Growth Scale, and I thought some nature spells). If it becomes relatively easy or common, though, it would reduce the uniqueness of that element of play.
As for defending undead, I assume by "Turn Undead" you mean Banishment, which is resisted by magic resistance, which can be strengthened by Antimagic, or (I think) the dark blessings, no? Again, this too seems like one of the more interesting and colorful aspects of the game (that summoning and banishing are both relatively easy for certain units, rather than unbalanced.
Of course, I am still (after several SP games) much closer to the "wow, look at all these neat things" stage of analysis than the "competetive MP guru" stage.
PvK
|
November 16th, 2003, 01:16 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor
You are using a somewhat different definition of "unbalanced". Consider the simple game of rock-paper-scissors. Would you say that the game is unbalanced? "Paper has no defense against scissors!"
Returning to the discussion at hand, each nation has strengths and weaknesses - there's nothing wrong with that, in fact that's what makes this game so interesting.
That said, there *are* balance issues in the game, but they are complex enough that most of them will take a while to be certain of. The two that seem obvious to me are that a) combat pretenders in general are probably underpriced for their relative benefits, and b) the blood economy is more boost-able than the magic/gold economies, which makes a bigger difference now that both of the latter have been scaled down.
Compared to those, other balance issues seem quite minor to me, but your mileage may vary.
|
November 16th, 2003, 01:19 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor
Quote:
Originally posted by DominionsFAN:
I think that there should be spells like summon population. Why not? This is a fantasy wargame afterall! All things should have some counter, that is the key.
Now we dont have counter when Ermor kills the pop, we cannot remove curse, and the curse spell is so cheap, Ermor cannot defend against turn undead..etc.
Frankly, some things are totally unbalanced.
|
Ermor is my great as long as you are Ermor.
I agree that population killing domains and curse are the two things that bother me the most about this game but hey we can always beg counters to them in Dominions 3.
Sammual
|
November 16th, 2003, 01:27 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor
Yeah, a growth domain would not help you. Unfortunately, in Dominions there is no minimum growth in a growth domain, and the maximal growth rate is .7% (or a doubling time of roughly 100 turns) so you can never regrow population in low-population provinces. By turn 40, if you started with a pop-300 province on turn 1, and had a growth-3 scale, you'd have 390 people. And that's assuming you can increase population in increments of less than 10 people, which I'm not really sure about... if the minimal increment is 10, then you can never increase population in a province with less than 1430 people, unless there's some randomness thrown in.
A lot of people seem to want more growth possibilities, but the developers are gloomy pessimists who like to dwell in dark, apocalyptic worlds Which is nice because it brings interesting Blood and Death spells, but unfortunate in terms of curing battle afflictions and regrowing population. But maybe a base pop. growth slider will be added, or the scale effects will be adjustable with mods, or a minimum population growth per turn will be added (to abstract immigration) - with a minimum of 10 pop/turn/growth scale, your +3 growth, 300 pop province would hit 1470 by turn 40!
-Cherry
P.S. I also think that population should flow from province to province based on population happiness, which would be a combination of unrest, taxes, and scales... where growth, order, neutral heat, low unrest, high defense, fortresses, temples, and low taxes all increase happiness, and patrols prevent emigration. Death domains, taxes, blood-hunting, and patrols would still decrease population, but half the reduction would be to death, and half would be due to emigration.
[ November 15, 2003, 23:36: Message edited by: Saber Cherry ]
|
November 16th, 2003, 01:28 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor
Quote:
Originally posted by trebuchet:
You are using a somewhat different definition of "unbalanced". Consider the simple game of rock-paper-scissors. Would you say that the game is unbalanced? "Paper has no defense against scissors!"
|
Hahahaha....
|
November 16th, 2003, 02:22 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
Actually, it seems to me that having everything have a way to undo it, is more like generic rock-paper-scissors than "key". I think it's actually more interesting when some situations can't be undone, or not easily.
|
I would like everything to be able to be undone, even if it takes the use of a wish.
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
I would enjoy having, say, an item and/or spell that protects against getting cursed, and a costly way to remove a curse, but I don't think curses are unbalanced, because they just make afflictions more likely. That is actually an interesting counter-balance to super-combattants. The reason I'd like protection or (especially) removal options is just for roleplaying and my preferred play style of trying to keep experienced fighters alive.
I also enjoy the lack of easy ways to repopulate provinces for similar reasons - it's an interesting effect that adds flavor, and part of the interest is that it is hard to undo. I suppose it would be interesting if there were some difficult/rare ways to do this, perhaps by relocating population rather than making people appear out of thin air, or slowly through high-level nature magic or something (there is already Wish, Growth Scale, and I thought some nature spells). If it becomes relatively easy or common, though, it would reduce the uniqueness of that element of play.
As for defending undead, I assume by "Turn Undead" you mean Banishment, which is resisted by magic resistance, which can be strengthened by Antimagic, or (I think) the dark blessings, no? Again, this too seems like one of the more interesting and colorful aspects of the game (that summoning and banishing are both relatively easy for certain units, rather than unbalanced.
|
I am fine with the undead vs banishment balance as it is.
I would like to see ways to reduce the chance of getting cursed (item) and/or ways of removing it (Wish or other high powered spell) but I like curse as a SC defense.
Sammual
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|