Lack of supplies...

[Tuidjy]

One of my armies lacked 26 supply units. It did not get them. As a result,
about 250 units got diseased. This is more than 50% of the troops, and
about 10 times as many men as supplies were lacking.

Now, it was only my fault I let the guys starve - I had no time to take the
turn. But seriously, shouldn't only the weakest X units get a disease when
only X supplies are missing?

[lch]

Sounds fishy. Only units that were already starving the turn before should have gone diseased, I think.

[Jazzepi]

You might have walked into a province with a disease causing site.

Jazzepi

[llamabeast]

That doesn't sound normal for lack of supplies. I've had an army that's been 10% starving for ages (maybe 10 turns), and it's mostly fine.

[Tuidjy]

I had searched the province at level 3-4 for anything but fire and blood.
I found no bad sites. It has white man's hill(!), another good site, and
something that causes 5 points of unrest.

In any case, the number of diseased troops is extremely close to 50%.
It's a shooty army, so I would not be surprised if it is exactly 50 plus
the few units who were diseased before the disaster.

[Szumo]

Is that something that causes 5 points of unrest called Inkpot something by chance? Because that site spreads disease...