|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
June 6th, 2006, 11:24 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Assault/Battle Rifles
I have been thinking of this subject for a while and I began to think. So having done a little research, I am asking about the ratings for the various modern rifles.
I noticed that there is no difference between the G3 and the G36 except a different picture. Both are range8, HEK3, Acc1. The same is true of the M16 and the SA80.
One might like to mention (without being disrespectful) that the G3 MAY be capable of full-auto but can rarely be fired as such owing to the recoil of 7.62mm rounds. This is the distinct advantage of the small-calibre rifles.
Also, the G36, L85, Steyr Aug, IMI Tavor, versions of the FN-FNC and SIG 550/551 series, SAR-21 and certainly the XM-8, all of these possess between 1.5x and 4x magnification battle sights, proven to radically improve the standard of shooting.
The British Army has routinely fitted such sights since the 1950s/60s as a part of their infantry doctrine. One study between the M16a1 and the L85a1 indicated that in the hands of an average shot, the M16 was sufficiently accurate out to 250m, but the SUSAT equipped L85 was so out to 400m, almost the same range as an expert firing the M16.
Given that all the 1st rank powers routinely equip their weapons with low magnification sights, as can be seen in Iraq and Afghanistan, I would propose that the accuracy and HEK ratings be adjusted.
Richard
|
June 6th, 2006, 01:38 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault/Battle Rifles
Quote:
The British Army has routinely fitted such sights since the 1950s/60s as a part of their infantry doctrine.
|
Now that is really amazing news to me, since my SLR only had iron sights in the 70's, as did every other one I saw even in other units. (Actually, the SA series introduced these sights, apart from the cadets version which has iron sights and no auto facility).
Plenty of rifles (such as the SA80, Steyr, XM8) already have accuracy 6 to allow for scoped sights, fitted as standard issue.
So I presume you are asking for some we may have missed to be so equipped?.
If so - then it would be handy to have a list of OOB and weapon slot ID No to have a look at, where these sights are shown to be standard issue. (which it is not, for e.g. the M16 family - in which case you may want to suggest a scoped version in a new slot, and suggest which units should be modified to use same, and/or new units created to use it, which can be a problem in crowded OOBS such as say the USA one). Also - while going through the OOBS, remember that the same weapon may have different names (e.g. stg77, Austeyer). And then, allow for some third world armies which may not have the version with such kit perhaps.
Since that may be a big list - it would probaly be best to make up a .TXT file of those change requests/suggestions , and attach it to your post rather than try to fit them into a single post.
Cheers
Andy
|
June 6th, 2006, 01:57 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault/Battle Rifles
Quote:
Mobhack said:
Quote:
The British Army has routinely fitted such sights since the 1950s/60s as a part of their infantry doctrine.
|
Now that is really amazing news to me, since my SLR only had iron sights in the 70's, as did every other one I saw even in other units.
Cheers
Andy
|
I think he's refering to the SUIT, or whater the thing was called. one of hte pictures of the FAL in the gmae has one fitted. apprently the sight picture was the same as the SUSAT but with the needle pointing downwards.
|
June 6th, 2006, 02:24 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,957
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault/Battle Rifles
SUIT (Sight Unit Infantry Trilux ) was introduced about the same period as the SA-80. May even have been the original sight unit - and SUSAT came later on?.
It certainly was not in service in the Falklands war for example. Maybe by say 85/6, and unlikely to be issued to all SLR users, probably just specialist issue (say in NI?).
Andy
|
June 7th, 2006, 12:06 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HQ-RS, Kabul, Afghanistan
Posts: 167
Thanks: 64
Thanked 28 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault/Battle Rifles
Gentlemen,
One of my biggest complaints is that the US Army still doesn't have scopes on all their rifles. Neither M16A2 nor M4 come with them as standard issue, unless something different is happening in the combat zones.
Will
|
June 7th, 2006, 07:20 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Assault/Battle Rifles
I do apologise. I've just checked on the SA-80... I am awfully sorry to be annoying. Half my complaint is now invalidated! So glad you guys had thought about this.
The only other point I can stick to has to be that the G3 should not be rated as an assault rifle (HEK3) on grounds of 7.62mm ammunition. Possibly the bolt-action rifles remain on HEK1, SLRs on HEK3 (vast difference in firepower) and the small-calibre assault rifles at HEK4.
On the SUSAT/SUIT, yes that was what I referring to possibly the British Army began to introduce the SUIT around 1982?
Everytime I look, these designers seem to be one step ahead... and we're not paying them???
(a rather embarassed)
Richard
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|