.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 28th, 2000, 04:17 PM
Jubala's Avatar

Jubala Jubala is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Link�ping, �sterg�tland, Sweden
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jubala is on a distinguished road
Default Depleted Uranium Cannons to powerful!

Am I the only one to notice with the 0.99 demo that DUC's are now so powerful as to render Meson BLasters and Anti Proton Beams practically useless? A DUC at max techlevel can dish out 40 points of damage while a Meson BLaster at max tech level can only deliver 30 points of damage but has one square longer range. Anti-Proton Beams at max tech level dish out 50 points of damage at point blank range and the same as the DUC at it's maximum range. The DUC is very cheap and fast to get to max tech level while Meson BLasters and Anti-Proton Beams are very expensive to get to max tech level. So why bother with them? Why not rush to DUC V and stick with that until you get Incinerator Beams or something? I think they need to be toned down. I also think the research cost for the Meson BLasters need to be lowered a little, but maybe that's just because I like them so much.
__________________
You don't go through the hardships of an ocean voyage to make friends...
You can make friends at home!
-Eric The Viking-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 28th, 2000, 05:27 PM

Repo Man Repo Man is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Repo Man is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Depleted Uranium Cannons to powerful!

That was my initial thought too. However, if DUC level out at higher levels, but beamers continue to improve, then I would leave it as is. Players would then be forced to chose between a faster rising tech verses a slower, but ultimately more powerful technology
__________________
~~Repo Man at your service~~
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 29th, 2000, 12:19 AM
Instar's Avatar

Instar Instar is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Instar is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Depleted Uranium Cannons to powerful!

Used to be that DUCs were useless, I never use them
__________________
When a cat is dropped, it always lands on its feet, and when toast is dropped, it always lands with the buttered side facing down. I propose to strap buttered toast to the back of a cat. The two will hover, spinning inches above the ground. With a giant buttered cat array, a high-speed monorail could easily link New York with Chicago.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 29th, 2000, 01:16 AM
Taqwus's Avatar

Taqwus Taqwus is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Taqwus is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Depleted Uranium Cannons to powerful!

The main advantage of APBs vs DUCs in the 0.99 demo appears to be range at higher tech; by the time APB tech reaches 12 (Energy Stream Weapons), their range is 8, versus 5 for DUCs. But you have to take ESW up to 8 before you get a range of 6, even... 'level cost' for ESW is listed as 5000 (and you start with 0 normally, plus it requires Physics 1, 50000 cost), versus 2500 for Projectile (and you start at 1). DUCs even cost less supply per shot (2 vs 5 for DUC-V vs APB XII), but are more expensive components in terms of minerals at the same range (DUC V vs APB VI) it seems (300 vs 175).

Hrm. All this complexity is a balancer's nightmare, heh.

FWIW, I believe that the AIs seem to prefer APBs, so if you're looking for gaining research through espionage, scrapping stolen ships, or other hostile means, you might want to focus on Projectiles for a while and let the AIs bother with ESW.

------------------
-- The thing that goes bump in the night
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 29th, 2000, 03:04 AM
Jubala's Avatar

Jubala Jubala is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Link�ping, �sterg�tland, Sweden
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jubala is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Depleted Uranium Cannons to powerful!

Yes, APB's are better then Duc's, but only after a huge research investment. Meson BLasters can hardly be argued to be better then DUC's as they have lower firepower and only outrange the DUC's by one.
__________________
You don't go through the hardships of an ocean voyage to make friends...
You can make friends at home!
-Eric The Viking-
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 29th, 2000, 03:25 AM

Saben Saben is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Saben is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Depleted Uranium Cannons to powerful!

DU cannons do 40 damage at the top end, for 30 kt space. That is 1.333 damage per kiloton.

Meson bLasters do 30 damage at the top end, for 20 kt space. That is 1.5 damage per kiloton.

Conclusion: DUC weapons are less_ efficent than meson bLasters, with less range and less damage per kiloton.


[This message has been edited by Saben (edited 29 October 2000).]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.