OT:An Observation

[Atrocities]

The Enemy Below

In 1957 a war movie starring Robert Mitchum and Curd J�rgens was released and decades later it was adapted for the Star Trek episode Balance of Terror.

Now there has been no, and I doubt there ever will be, any formal acknowledgment of that The Enemy Below was the guiding force behind the Star Trek Episode Balance of Terror, but the similarities cannot be ignored.

In The Enemy Below, Robert Mitchum plays the captain of a US destroyer, The Hayes, on patrol in the south Atlantic during the second world war. While on patrol, the Hayes stumbles across a German U-boat captained by Curd J�rgens. J�rgens character, Captain Von Stolberg has grown disillusioned with the war but never the less does his duty to the bitter end. A similarity to the Romulan Captain played by Mark Leonard in [i]Balance of Terror]/i].

Mitchums character, Captain Murrell, starts a cat and mouse game with the German U-boat all the while being careful not to underestimate its Captain. Likewise the U-boat Captain tried every trick in the book to evade the Hayes and time and again is out matched by the Captain of the Destroyer that pursues him. At one point the U-boat Captains tactics are anticipated by the Captain of the Hayes and J�rgens tells his First Officer, �He is the devil that one.� A very close similarity to �He is a sorcerer that one.� Said by Mark Leonard�s character, The Romulan Commander, in Balance of Terror shortly after being out smarted by Kirk.

The U-boat, like its Romulan Bird of Prey counter part, can hide from view. In the U-boats case it simply submerges and can only be tracked via under water sonar while the Bird of Prey cloaks and could only be tracked by motion sensors.

Both ships use torpedoes that are devastatingly powerful. Both ships are limited by speed barriers and can easily be over run by their opponent�s vessels. And both vessels have an energy resource issue, that is they are running out of fuel. (Batter life for the U-boat)

As it was done in the Star Trek episode where Kirk must press the attack against the Romulan ship, Mitchums must confront the U-boat before it can pull his ship into a trap with a German Raider, so he lunges forward to attack and having anticipated the tactic, J�rgens character fires his torpedoes at an opportune time striking The Hayes.

Mitchums knowing that his only chance at success now lies in luring the U-boat into a trap. He plays dead in the water and has fires set on the deck to give the appearance that his ship was heavily damaged by the attack. A tactic that Kirk uses in Balance of Terror a decade later. The U-boat Captain buys the bait and moves in close to finish The Hayes off only to shelled and ultimately rammed by The Hayes. In the end the U-Boat is destroyed by a self destruct device that also takes out The Hayes. In Star Trek the destruction of the Romulan ship was also done by measures of a self destruct device, but the Enterprise was not destroyed as that would have ended the series.

Mitchums character also had a good working relationship with the ships doctor and executive officers. You can see it in his acting and he too shares a moment of reflection with the Doctor and is given advice much like the character of McCoy, the Enterprises ship Doctor, gives to Captain Kirk.

�In this galaxy, there's a mathematical probability of three million Earth-type planets. And in all of the universe, three million, million galaxies like this. But in all of that, and perhaps more, only one of each of us.� - Dr. Leonard McCoy (DeForest Kelly)

Additionally the U-Boat Captain shares a very similar relationship with his First Officer. At one point J�rgens tells his First Officer about how he has grown to fear the war and what it has done to his beloved Germany, much like the talk between The Romulan Commander and his Centurion First Officer.

�Another war, must it always be so? How many comrades have we lost in this way?... Obedience. Duty. Death, and more death...� - Romulan Commander (Mark Leonard)

In the end both First Officers are killed as a result of battle, another strong similarity between the two.

Additionally both the movie and the Star Trek episode had a loyalist character that was for the most part tolerated with clentched teeth by the Command staff. The two characters shared a strong sense of loyalty to their government leader, one to Hitler, the other to The Praetor, and were a source of irritation to both Captains.

Both sets of Captains had respect for each other and were all men that knew their jobs. The similarities between the move and the Star Trek episode Balance of Terror, are unmistakable.

The move The Enemy Below is clearly the inspiration for the Star Trek episode Balance of Terror.

If you have not yet seen either of the movie The Enemy Below, or the Star Trek episode Balance of Terror, you should watch them both and make your own comparison. They are both excellent films of their era and I would highly recommend them.

[Slynky]

Not to "hijack" your post but it's just kind of strange...tonight I was comparing "Shogun" to "The Last Samurai" and pointing out similarities.

(sorry, now back to our regularly-scheduled program )

[geoschmo]

You're not the first person to come to this conclusion. Not that that takes away from your observation at all.

Another interesting observation is that the The Enemy Below, like most war movies, isn't really about what it appears. It's a fairly obvious metaphor for the cold war tensions that were coming to the fore in the 50's. Mutually assured destruction and all that.

[Atrocities]

Everytime I post about this someone asks me if I wrote this. I did. I wrote this about nine years ago and posted it on some old BBS posting system on some obsqure star trek web page way back in 1995.

Back then I had nothing better to do so I made observations like this from time to time. This is the only one that I had on floppy. Revisisted for your pleasure.

[Kamog]

Originally posted by Slynky:
Not to "hijack" your post but it's just kind of strange...tonight I was comparing "Shogun" to "The Last Samurai" and pointing out similarities.

(sorry, now back to our regularly-scheduled program )

I noticed that the James Bond movie "Goldeneye" has a very similar story to the Steven Seagal movie "Under Siege 2".
Jean-Claude van Damme's "The Quest" is similar to "Bloodsport". (Come to think of it, there's a lot of other movies with more or less the same story. )
Jet Li's "Fist of Legend" is very similar to Bruce Lee's "Chinese Connection".

OK, I guess a lot of action / martial arts -type movies are not very original...

[narf poit chez BOOM]

I get seriously annoyed every time I see another book with a dark lord who's hordes threaten the kingdom and the only one who can save them is the prophesied king/queen, who has a band of loyal companions who's ranks include a thief and a priest+healer and some sort of outback character, either a barbarian type, a ranger type or a predatory animal that is non-theless either intelligent and loyal or just loyal.

Yes, there really are a lot of books that seem to match that description exactly, although I generally only read the back.

Although the back is generally accurate enough when it comes to the basic types of abilities the heroes have.