[Numahr]

Guys, is it not supposed to be a no-diplomacy game? If diplomacy is allowed, I should reply, try to find allies against this aggression etc. But then we will really break the rules of the game, and I like the uncertainty about each other's intentions created by the no-diplomacy, plus I committed to this game knowing that i don't have time to play the diplomacy game because of RL constraints.

So please let's not use diplomacy and let's make our decisions as if it was a "game against AI except that they are human-controlled", as advertised in the first post, with no communication aimed at influencing others' strategies...

PS: Ghoul, if we had diplomacy enabled, either we would have a NAP or you would have refused, either way you would not have been able to attack me by surprise. The no-diplo rule clearly gave you an advantage for staging your attack, and to catch me off-guard. If diplomacy was allowed, I too would have approached other players when I received your attack. So please don't violate the rule now.

Beside, since you have your message published and I can't delete it, I think I have to reply once before, hopefully, going back to the silence of a no-diplo game:

Agarthans, answer the question sincerely before unleashing such hate discourse: who is attacking whom and who is attacked? Should I just leave your ugly giants capture my lands without resistance? As if you did not know what assets I have and I would use when you unleashed your Giants on me: I have numbers, you have quality. So instead of whining of your own decisions, be brave and fight the war you started yourself with honor.