Quote:
Originally Posted by pyg
I happen to like (and am used to) rainbow pretenders and I think cranking the magic sites setting nullifies some of their advantages.
|
From other earlier discussions people have expressed that diversity is better with more sites as then there is simply more sites to find.
Luck is still always the most significant factor. At a higher ratio you'll see more players who got "lucky" with a good gem economy. I like when there's many contenders for the throne, a higher ratio helps ensure that.
What about random events? Yeah, I think they are a bit problematic too but only in the impact they can have on the early game. They aren't nearly as big a deal as not having found any of the (permanent unlike most minor one-time events) sites that support your nation's magic and they are a great part of the scale economy...
Perhaps we should simply vote?
We are a couple who have expressed a preference for higher site ratio and Just Qio who is strongly against it (on principal reasons?)