Re: StuG Question.
Hi Claus
So Im guessing then that your origional comment "The Sf.14z is, has always been and remains a simple set of binoculars" attributed to Ogorkiewicz is in fact incorrect? Does Ogorkiewicz even mention sf14? Needless to say this is why I prefer quotations rather than paraphrase. Paraphrase can be very misleading.
Good to hear you have changed your position from SF14 being a simple binoclar to being a superior binoclar. So it just remains to be settled how superior.
Your quote from mobhack is interesting. The Nashorn is equipped with the sf14. Mobhacks description fits it, ie a sterioscopic artillery type "rangefinder" The real Rangefinders were all issued to the Flak ie AA not Artillery.
So whatever the rangefinder value the Nashorn has, all the other vehicles equipped with Sf14 should also get it. If the real rangefinder gets 8 then Sf should probably get something less. Alternately the SF14 could get a RF value of 8 and the real rangefinders something higher as the two seem to be confused in the case of the Nashorn.
Circumstantial evidence is all I can offer for a high RF value for SF14 in that the Nashorn had it and was a famously accurate shooter and it appears from the origional post so was the stug. ie there is no other explanation of both vehicles being very accurate other than their common peice of kit, the SF14 (ie I think it does make a difference in game terms).
Regards Chuck.
|