Re: Short list and exploits
A shortlist of exploits generally considered forbidden would be good, though I suspect there'd be much debate over what got included.
I'd rather not see NAP rules formalized, though. Maybe a clear statement that different people interpret NAP differently, so you should spell out what you mean.
Anything that reduces diplomacy further towards: "NAP-3?", "k" is a bad thing.
I'd much rather encourage a little more roleplaying and actual negotiation instead.
|