
August 18th, 2003, 05:08 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT - Scientific proof that there is no afterlife!
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Since you refuse to acknowledge it... dimensions are not physical objects, and so do not have mass. Space and time are dimensions, not objects. I have amended my statements; there is nothing to reconcile.
And yes, photons do indeed have mass. They have both particle and wave properties. Ever heard of a solar sail? They work because photons have some mass (although it is extremeley small), and so they can push it along when they bump into the sail. This works with photo-receptive fans and such too. All energy has particle-like properties. All matter has wave-like properties. This is basic quantum physics.
And please stop insulting me Slick. That is quite counter productive. Please remain civil.
|
My appologies if you feel insulted, that was not my intention.
First of all, I do acknowlege the fact that space and time are not physical (having mass) objects! You refuse to acknowledge that they exist without having mass or energy.
Yes, I have heard of a solar sail (did some R&D at TRW). Photons do indeed carry momentum to impart to a sail. They do not have mass. There is your mistake. For a photon, momentum is given by:
p = (Plank's Const.)/(Wavelength)
See? momentum with no mass. Any basic physics book has this in it.
Photoreceptive fans react to the change in momentum when a photon encounters the fan, not because the photon has mass.
To the viewers out there, this is an example of "junk science". That is, it sounds good, but totally baseless in fact.
So, let's see... Questions Fyron refuses to answer:
Reconcile the fact that space and time exist but are not made up of energy or matter.
What is the exact value of the mass of a given photon?
Are you saying that if humans can't observe something then it doesn't exist?
(Sorry, but there are so many I don't want to have to keep looking back a few pages to keep track.) Please wrap up this discussion and answer these questions. Please be precise. Remember, you brought it up...
edit: will read the link.
Slick.
[ August 18, 2003, 04:09: Message edited by: Slick ]
__________________
Slick.
|