![]() |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
Quote:
|
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
I'm going to reply in Mindi's place as she's busy at the moment working on some of the reported issues. Edit: I took so long writing this post that this sentence is no longer true!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not sure if you've had a chance to fully explore the expanded options in your user control panel, and I know that some of the functionality there is still being tweaked, but there are many more controllable options for you there than we offered in the previous format. One of my favorite new features is the ability to forward and copy other users within the private messaging system. Maybe I'm alone, but this will make my life easier. Quote:
I think raising the pm limit to 300 is a good compromise, and we may have to come to agree to disagree on that for the time being. It's the same limit QT3 imposes on it's users, where there are also large communities running multi-player games. I understand it feels stifling to go from absolutely no limit to this, and that's our fault for being so liberal in the past then imposing a limit. The ability to export pm's to a text file, while seen by some as a punishment, is actually an enhancement some users have requested. Quote:
Thank you for your feedback. |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
Mindi:
Welcome to the Internet :) That is normal that users want everything. And that is normal that they will repeat their demands, especially when they seem important for them. And you need patience to calmly respond to everything. Or hire some volunteers for that :) OH, and expecting patience from users is extremely unrealistic. |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
Quote:
I've been on the internet since 1993, so I'm no stranger to this behavior. ;) That doesn't mean that I'm asking the impossible for some patience. Does it mean I will get it from everyone? No. But I don't think it's unreasonable to ask. |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
My biggest complaint, and one that will keep me away, regrettably if it cannot be addressed, is the tiny font size. While my eyes were much better before i hit 40, now that I am over 40, I need at least normal sized font that we used to have in the old dominions forums.
I cannot imagine that the new microscopic font size is intentional, but is some kind of kink being worked out. Thanks in advance for helping us older users whose eyes are not as sharp as they once were. |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
As has been pointed out, I guess it's true that we are in danger of running in panicking circles here. I've just been PMing with Mindi and she (like Annette above, and indeed Mindi herself earlier in the thread) reassures me that they're reading everything we're saying and they're taking it all into account, but of course these things take quite a while to implement, even working flat out as the Shrapnel team seem to be at the moment. So I guess we should probably reserve this thread for any issues which haven't already been discussed above, and in the meantime all try to be patient.
|
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
Quote:
This is the issue I have been working on.....can you tell me what browser you are using? |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
I agree with Xietor, I'm 17 and I need my eyes.:)
But this is being worked on I think from reading Llamas posts. Edit: Ahh Mindi beat me to it... |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
Quote:
Well, I think this passage here, hits on where the perceived value isn't translating from administrator > user. I know not everything is working fully, or implemented yet, don't get me wrong there. ;) But for many of us who are here already, the loss of things that are so integral to our use of the site, severely hampers our desire and enjoyment for seeking out and trying new features, so we only see the one that was pointed out so far, the avatars. I am sure with the current user base, if you asked people if they would prefer to have unlimited PM storage, or "photo albums", the overwhelming majority would choose the PMs. And it is this sort of decision that has led to such frustration from a number of people here. I mean, how many PMs worth of data does a single 800x600 image take up? Doing away with multi-quoting (I noticed that the forum no longer quotes the quotes of a quoted post, guessing PMs no longer do either) would do wonders for the actual storage space involved. And then it bears asking if those stored PMs actually impacted the site functionality or stability before the conversion tests were started? If not, it seems entirely reasonable to just expect it the next time, and warn people pre-emptively in a few years when someone thinks it's a good idea to go through all of this hassle again. ;) "Social Networking" is indeed popular. Mostly among 15 year olds, who shape much of what is "popular" in a consumer sense in this society. It can be directly tracked, that the rise or decline in popularity from on networking site to the next, is directly correlated to their high school age users. The argument being voiced is threefold: First, the Shrapnel community has very few users in that demographic. Secondly, adding that sort of tools is not entirely likely to spontaneously garner any sort of attention from them - shrapnelgames.com is not the new Facebook. And finally, if by some tragedy of fate they DID show up here it would be highly disruptive to the community at large, and would probably kill Shrapnel, for a short boost in sales. I know you said that rather than keep hearing complaints, you want suggestions to make things better. It must be somewhat disheartening, after all of this effort, to think that what you are seeing as complaints, largely are actually those very suggestions - but are generally the same suggestion in other words, "please don't make so many changes". It's hard to make suggestions that you might see as constructive, when to us the long term usability of the forums themselves has been compromised. Shrapnel Games, and the games that you distribute, has always been about niche appeal. I've read very verbose and well thought out blogs, posts, and news releases explaining why it's never been Shrapnel's goal to be "popular", or to compete in popularity contests. I think we're all just completely mystified, and a little distressed at how much of these changes are based on what "popular" sites do. <3 always, James Douglas Morrison (AKA Damon Schmitt :P) |
Re: New Board - Props and Slops
Mindi:
But you still do simplest admin mistake - reply to everything. Just go back to your job, let people do some complaining here and do a mass reply in 6, 12 or 24 hours. And you will have some things fixed by then, that is much better than posting replies :) And nothing bad will happen here. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.