![]() |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
BTW, copy pasta from /k/:
Current Attrition rates of Western military equipment in Ukraine (According to Oryx, all visually confirmed -- LOST includes damaged and destroyed) Tanks Leopard 2A6 (21) - Lost (9) - (43%) Leopard 2A4 (54) - Lost (7) - (13%) M-55s - (28) - Lost (2) - (7%) Challenger 2 (14) - Lost (1) - (7%) PT-91 Twardy (60) - Lost (2) - (3%) Leopard 1A5 (165) - Lost (0) - (0%) Strv 122s (10) - Lost (0) - (0%) AFVs AMX-10 RC (40) - Lost (4) - (10%) IFVs Bradley M2A2 (182) - Lost (53) - (29%) YPR-765 (196) - Lost (48) - (24%) CV90 (50) - Lost (3) - (6%) KTO Rosomak (200) - Lost (1) - (0.5%) Marder (40) - Lost (0) - (0%) APC M113 (778) - Lost (66) - (8%) FV103 Spartan (114) - Lost (3) - (3%) VAB (60) Delivered - Lost (12) - (20%) Patria Pasi (20) - Lost (7) - (35%) Bushmaster (90) - Lost (8) - (9%) Stryker - (157) - Lost (3) - (2%) |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
For all his whining, Mustang has a point...at what point do we consider a type extinct in service?
Russian Ground Forces had (on paper) 557 T-80 variants pre-war. Of this, 396 have been lost (71%) since the war started. Elsewhere, SIPRI said Russia had about 112~ Ka-52 Alligators in 2019. Oryx has visual evidence of 43 Ka-52 losses. (38.3%) One actually just crashed on a training flight earlier this month and one was just shot down outside of Robotyne: https://twitter.com/osinttechnical/s...35784827826365 https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/s...22168301236226 |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
Quote:
In any case full stabilization is a SA feature and Ukraine doesn't have it, hence the game is incorrect. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
Quote:
Yet southward progress is precisely what the Ukrainian soldiers with the call signs Karatsupa, Pan and Taba seek, driving their American-made Bradley Fighting Vehicles down a road that is also, they believe, the road to Ukrainian victory. Every day, under relentless fire, they drive fresh troops in and spent ones out, with just 30 seconds to make the swap on the battlefield. “I’ve been serving since 2014 and I’ve never encountered such minefields anywhere. Just hectares of them, to the left and to the right,” said Karatsupa. “A lot of trenches, dugouts. And all this for dozens of kilometers. They even throw mines at the territory we are taking. Without the mines, we would already be in Tokmak.” .... But without the Bradleys, say the men, no one would have survived. They proudly showed CNN some of the direct artillery hits the US-made armored vehicles had taken, singing their praises repeatedly |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
Quote:
|
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
Quote:
Quote:
Bradley has always had stabilization for the chaingun since 1981 |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
Quote:
https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/...94004193448307 https://twitter.com/GloOouD/status/1670766461248307202 :rolleyes: |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
Quote:
In the videos you posted it is evident the gun is not stabilized. But anyway, you did find it was able to fire weapons, but you also proved the sight is not stabilized. In the third video there is no Oryx loss traceable to the incident so they are firing at nothing. |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/QfbQu2y.jpg From TM 9-2350-252-10-2 for the Bradley. |
Re: Question about Ukraine OOB...
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA147208.pdf
BRADLEY INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE PROCEDURES GUIDE: COMMANDER AND GUNNER (FEBRUARY 1984) PDF Page 19, says that step #7 in shutting down the turret to exit the vehicle is to MOVE TO OFF...the STAB SWITCH. This is a manual from 1984, for the M2A0 -- we know this because the M2A1 was not introduced until 1986. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.