Re: Alternate history. 1930. The Reds attack!
 

whoa, you lost a company in there didn't you?i would probably lose a lot more due to my poor arty management

Re: Alternate history. 1930. The Reds attack!
 

Thank you :) It was kind of surreal to consider the Vickers 6 ton the "tiger" of the battle, but it truly was.

Re: Alternate history. 1930. The Reds attack!
 

Well done SITREP of your battle, Is this a campaign? Can we expect more?

Bob out:D

Re: Alternate history. 1930. The Reds attack!
 

And the Spanish Nationalists offered a nice bounty for any working T-26 handed over, as that was the "tigger" of the SCW. But a few short years later that same tank was just target practice material.

BTW - the Vickers medium is not in the 6 ton family, that was a smaller export model. And T-26 was a licensed copy of it, as were many local tank projects pre-war. T-26 was a developed 6 tonner, that had a main gun and a co-ax in the same turret.

Cheers
Andy

Re: Alternate history. 1930. The Reds attack!
 

Alt. history at it's best. Nice twist. Great job!