
January 9th, 2004, 03:00 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
Quote:
Originally posted by Loser:
quote: Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Worst game is tied for that Civ 3 expansion (because it is part of Civ 3) and MOO3.
|
Ouch. At least Civ III ws playable.
[edit: 2 != 3] So? There are a lot of horrid games that are "playable." And besides, part of the problem with Civ 3 is the evil marketing BS they pulled with it, splitting the game into 3 parts so they could milk more money without adding ANY meaningful features in any of the expansions. Civ 3 + 2 expansions at their best almost equal Civ 2 Gold at its worst, save some really stupid things like removing the hit point/firepower system of Civ 2 that helped tremendously over Civ 1. No comparison at all to Civ 2 ToT.
|