![]() |
Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
Would it be possible to add a selectable buttoned and unbuttoned option? The buttoned option might be more protective against close assault, and the unbuttoned option giving more vision.
|
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
The game already does that automatically
|
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
I'd like both. The auto-button feature, and a manual mode, settable by the user. :happy:
|
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
No, for the same reason we aren't going to allow the player to select the ammo type
|
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
Quote:
|
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
Pardon the off-topic, but speaking of unbuttoned ("ready") stationary tanks, was their spotting ability much less than similarly situated infantry? Just wondering if a tank commander's view of the battlefield would be all that different from a squad leader's. Thanks.
|
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
Quote:
Infantry on foot spot better than tanks. APC + loaded grunts spot better than a plain tank, as does a tank + tank riders. The more hexes you have moved, the worse your spotting becomes. The more suppressed, ditto. Andy |
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
Quote:
This is quite wrong, contrary to common sense, and contrary to training and practice of armor maneuver in WWII. For example, following established German practice of accelerating out of smoke/cover and crossing open terrain at high speed has the in game result of being more hazardous rather than less hazardous. Largely because of this, the use of historically incorrect tactics and TOE's (infantry leading through open terrain - skipping overwatch due to ineffectiveness - suicidal tank riders in front lines - inverse ratio of infantry to armor in armor maneuver units etc) is the optimal approach in game. I really wish there was either a checkbox somewhere to disconnect the target's spotting ability from the close assault equation or a percentage control adjusting close assault chances somewhere in either preferences or an ini file. So while I don't see any utility to a button/unbutton control, I'd give my left testicle for some control over close assault chances. |
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
Quote:
Another possible way of handling it would be to strongly decrease the close assault success probability with increasing vehicle speed so that it would compensate for the decreasing spotting ability. This method would preserve the fact that buttoned-up vehicles really were easier to surprise by close assaults. |
Re: Buttoned And Unbuttoned Option
Eh? - who said anywhere that vehicle speed had anything to do with the chance of a close assault success?
If you blunder into unspotted infantry then it does not matter what speed you are going at. It's infantry that have moved that have less chance of a close assault success. If you move a rifle section 2 hexes and then try to assault a passing tank, it will be at a much reduced rate than if it had ended up alongside the grunts. A closed down vehicle is a little easier to assault as it is unaware. A fast-moving vehicle is not a closed down vehicle unless somebody hosed it with MG fire or whatever. Andy |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.