Re: Flaming arrows vs abysia...
 

Now thats a post in need of context.

Re: Flaming arrows vs abysia...
 

Yes, I am aware of the many counters you have owing from an army three times the size of mine, twice the income in gems and gold, and at least as much magic. I hope you see my cancellation of our NAP for what it was: a simple cry for attention. I don't want to fight. I just want you to notice that I'm here.

Re: Flaming arrows vs abysia...
 

consider yourself noticed. Ulm repeats-we want no conflict.

Re: Flaming arrows vs abysia...
 

"Peace For Our Time," eh?

Re: Flaming arrows vs abysia...
 

well, more like, you are the fifth player to declare war on me. so i guess for me, that's not exactly peace. but i guess it's fun to pig pile. you know i can't really carry through on a war on any of you, so there is no risk for you at all.

Re: Flaming arrows vs abysia...
 

I'm actually quite surprised to be called the fifth to declare war on you. You invaded Arco, are you counting them? You then attacked Van, not the other way around (or am i mistaken there?). In any case the only other nation I know you to have been fighting at the time I ended our NAP-4 was Jotunheim. Seeing as you smacked his main army down, it doesn't seem right to call me part of a dog pile.

As I said, merely forcing you to worry about your western "protected" side of the map has value. Neither of us are really positioned to invade each other properly.

Warmly, Abysia

Re: Flaming arrows vs abysia...
 

hey, warmly abysia-pun intended?

you are right, you were second. then two others. and i did initiate hostilities with the vans. after im gone, you'll see why.

i was just saying, no peace for me. whether i want it or not.