.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Multiplayer and AARs (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145)
-   -   Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running) (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=44695)

Belac March 17th, 2010 01:52 PM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
Machaka and Shinuyama have a NAP-3.

Agent Smith March 17th, 2010 08:33 PM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
To the cowards,
I commend your ability to learn from the writings of Machiavelli. You really had me going there with thoughts of plunder, adventure and conquest. Now, the true face of evil is revealed. My name is Agent Smith, you took my borderlands, prepare to die.

SnallTrippin March 18th, 2010 08:07 AM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
You'd think people would have learned from my death..heh.

Belac March 21st, 2010 01:40 PM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
Machaka will end its NAP with Arcoscephale in due time (3 turns).

Dark Kitty March 21st, 2010 01:52 PM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
The nation of Shinuyama is cancelling its NAP with Arcocephale

Cicero March 24th, 2010 04:36 PM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
Well, I think I've gone far enough for a first play. Honor to Tien'Chi that has massed an impressive army.

Just one note: as diplomacy was stated binding, I think that Shinuyama has acted in a very irregular way. It is useless to say you will cancel the NAP in 3 turns and then taking three of my provinces before the right turn by the excuse of failing stealthy armies. I know that there is no referee or similar, still I don't want this to go unobserved.

Dark Kitty March 24th, 2010 05:39 PM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
EDIT : Argh, double post, please see below

Dark Kitty March 24th, 2010 05:43 PM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
Yes, it happened two turns in a row : 58 and 59 (however if memory serves, I took "only" two provinces that way : 136 and 154, what would be the third one?). I wrote to you to apologize both times in all good faith. And what I said was true : my orders were "sneak", not "attack". I don't mind someone looking at my turns and the orders I submitted to check. I guess it would be SnallTrippin.

I understand this must have messed your preparations and/or defense and I apologize once again, however I did not do it on purpose (that said I saw in a thread on NAP yesterday that it was of bad taste to sneak troops in your new ennemy's territory before the NAP was completely over so I'm sorry for that too)

If you really feel it was unfair (and I would understand), how would you feel about extending the end of our NAP to when you see it fit? (+2, +4, +6 turns, etc...)

Num March 25th, 2010 06:23 AM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
See you out there, very soon :(

Sorry for have been a so weak ally

Dark Kitty March 25th, 2010 08:24 AM

Re: Rattlehead - MA Newbie game (running)
 
@Cicero : Having received no answer here or to my PMs, I assume the war with Arco is starting/continuing after all?

If you would like to "postpone" the end of our NAP or something like that, please post here or send me a PM, I won't do my turn until a few hours from now...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.